Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1903.08431

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Databases

arXiv:1903.08431 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 Mar 2019]

Title:How Far are we from Data Mining Democratisation? A Systematic Review

Authors:Alfonso de la Vega, Diego García-Saiz, Marta Zorrilla, Pablo Sánchez
View a PDF of the paper titled How Far are we from Data Mining Democratisation? A Systematic Review, by Alfonso de la Vega and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Context: Data mining techniques have demonstrated to be a powerful technique for discovering insights hidden in data from a domain. However, these techniques demand very specialised skills. People willing to analyse data often lack these skills, so they must rely on data scientists, which hinders data mining democratisation. Different approaches have appeared in the last years to address this issue.
Objective: Analyse the state of the art to know how far are we from an effective data mining democratisation, what has already been accomplished, and what should be done in the upcoming years.
Method: We performed a state-of-the-art review following a systematic and objective procedure, which included works both from the academia and the industry. The reviewed works were grouped in four categories. Each category was then evaluated in detail using a well-defined evaluation criteria to identify its strengths and weaknesses.
Results: Around 700 works were initially considered, from which 43 were finally selected for a more in-depth analysis. Only two out of the four identified categories provide effective solutions to data mining democratisation. From these two categories, one always requires a minimum intervention of a data scientist, whereas the other one does not provide support for all the stages of the data mining process, and might exhibit accuracy problems in some contexts.
Conclusion: In all analysed approaches, a data scientist is still required to perform some steps of the analysis process. Moreover, automated approaches that do not require data scientists for some steps expose some problems in other quality attributes, such as accuracy. Therefore, although existent work shows some promising initial steps, we are still far from data mining democratisation.
Subjects: Databases (cs.DB)
MSC classes: 68T35
ACM classes: H.2.8
Cite as: arXiv:1903.08431 [cs.DB]
  (or arXiv:1903.08431v1 [cs.DB] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.08431
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Alfonso De La Vega [view email]
[v1] Wed, 20 Mar 2019 10:52:53 UTC (412 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled How Far are we from Data Mining Democratisation? A Systematic Review, by Alfonso de la Vega and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.DB
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-03
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Alfonso de la Vega
Diego García-Saiz
Marta E. Zorrilla
Pablo Sánchez
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack