close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1903.07937

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:1903.07937 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 19 Mar 2019 (v1), last revised 19 Jun 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:Probing the weak wind phenomenon in Galactic O-type giants

Authors:E. S. G. de Almeida, W. L. F. Marcolino, J.-C. Bouret, C. B. Pereira
View a PDF of the paper titled Probing the weak wind phenomenon in Galactic O-type giants, by E. S. G. de Almeida and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Analyses of Galactic late O dwarfs (O8-O9.5V) raised the `weak wind problem': spectroscopic mass loss rates ($\dot{M}$) are up to two orders of magnitude lower than the theoretical values. We investigated the stellar and wind properties of Galactic late O giants (O8-O9.5III). We performed a spectroscopic analysis of nine O8-O9.5III stars in the ultraviolet (UV) and optical regions using the model atmosphere code CMFGEN. From the UV region, we found $\dot{M}$ $\sim$ $10^{-8}-10^{-9}$ $\mathrm{M_\odot}$ $\mathrm{yr^{-1}}$ overall. This is lower by $\sim 0.9 - 2.3$ dex than the predicted values based on the (global) conservation of energy in the wind. The mass-loss rates predicted from first principles, based on the moving reversing layer theory, agree better with our findings, but it fails to match the spectroscopic $\dot{M}$ for the most luminous OB stars. The region of $\log(L_\star/L_\odot) \sim 5.2$ is critical for both sets of predictions in comparison with the spectroscopic mass-loss rates. CMFGEN models with the predicted $\dot{M}$ (the former one) fail to reproduce the UV wind lines for all the stars of our sample. We reproduce the observed H$\alpha$ profiles of four objects with our $\dot{M}$ derived from the UV. Hence, low $\dot{M}$ values (weak winds) are favored to fit the observations (UV + optical), but discrepancies between the UV and H$\alpha$ diagnostics remain for some objects. Our results indicate weak winds beyond the O8-9.5V class, since the region of $\log(L_\star/L_\odot) \sim 5.2$ is indeed critical to the weak wind phenomenon. Since O8-O9.5III stars are more evolved than O8-9.5V, evolutionary effects do not seem to play a role in the onset of the weak wind phenomenon. These findings support that the $\dot{M}$ (for low luminosity O stars) in use in the majority of modern stellar evolution codes must be severely overestimated up to the end of the H-burning phase.
Comments: 44 pages, 23 figures, accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics on 12/02/2019. Abstract shortened to fit within arXiv character limit. Final version after language editing
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:1903.07937 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:1903.07937v2 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.07937
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 628, A36 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834266
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Elisson Saldanha da Gama de Almeida [view email]
[v1] Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:09:33 UTC (7,728 KB)
[v2] Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:09:38 UTC (7,726 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Probing the weak wind phenomenon in Galactic O-type giants, by E. S. G. de Almeida and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack