Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1903.06747

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Physics Education

arXiv:1903.06747 (physics)
[Submitted on 15 Mar 2019 (v1), last revised 27 Jul 2020 (this version, v4)]

Title:Relative impacts of different grade-scales on student success in introductory physics

Authors:David J. Webb, Cassandra A. Paul, Mary K. Chessey
View a PDF of the paper titled Relative impacts of different grade-scales on student success in introductory physics, by David J. Webb and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In deciding on a student's grade in a class, an instructor generally needs to combine many individual grading judgments into one overall judgment. Two relatively common numerical scales used to specify individual grades are the 4-point scale (where each whole number 0-4 corresponds to a letter grade) and the percent scale (where letter grades A through D are uniformly distributed in the top 40% of the scale). This paper uses grading data from a single series of courses offered over a period of 10 years to show that the grade distributions emerging from these two grade scales differed in many ways from each other. Evidence suggests that the differences are due more to the grade scale than to either the students or the instructors. One major difference is that the fraction of students given grades less than C- was over 5 times larger when instructors used the percent scale. The fact that each instructor who used both grade scales gave more than 4 times as many of these low grades under percent scale grading suggests that the effect is due to the grade scale rather than the instructor. When the percent scale was first introduced in these courses in 2006, one of the authors of this paper, who is also one of the instructors in this data set, had confidently predicted that any changes in course grading would be negligible. They were not negligible, even for this instructor.
Subjects: Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1903.06747 [physics.ed-ph]
  (or arXiv:1903.06747v4 [physics.ed-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.06747
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 16, 020114 (2020)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020114
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: David Webb [view email]
[v1] Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:44:37 UTC (1,893 KB)
[v2] Tue, 19 Mar 2019 04:03:10 UTC (1,893 KB)
[v3] Fri, 24 Apr 2020 20:23:26 UTC (367 KB)
[v4] Mon, 27 Jul 2020 19:44:21 UTC (2,725 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Relative impacts of different grade-scales on student success in introductory physics, by David J. Webb and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.ed-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-03
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack