Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1903.01762v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:1903.01762v1 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 5 Mar 2019 (this version), latest version 23 Apr 2019 (v3)]

Title:Spectroscopic analysis of OB stars in the SMC questions the standard picture of massive star evolution, star-formation history and feedback at low metallicity

Authors:Varsha Ramachandran, W.-R. Hamann, L. M. Oskinova, J. S. Gallagher, R. Hainich, T. Shenar, A. A. C. Sander, H. Todt, L. Fulmer
View a PDF of the paper titled Spectroscopic analysis of OB stars in the SMC questions the standard picture of massive star evolution, star-formation history and feedback at low metallicity, by Varsha Ramachandran and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Stars which start their lives with spectral types O and early-B are the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae, long gamma-ray bursts, neutron stars, and black holes. These massive stars are the primary sources of stellar feedback in star-forming galaxies. At low metallicities, the properties of massive stars and their evolution are not yet fully explored. Here we report a spectroscopic study of 320 OB stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. The data, which we obtained with the ESO Very Large Telescope, were analyzed using state-of-the-art stellar atmosphere models. We find that the stellar winds of our sample stars are much weaker than theoretically expected. The stellar rotation rates show a bi-modal distribution. We determine the fundamental stellar parameters and build up an empiric Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Our results show indications for a dichotomy in the evolution of metal-poor single massive stars. With initial masses less than 30 solar masses, they become red supergiants and likely end up as type II-P supernovae. The more massive stars, however, appear to evolve quasi chemically-homogeneously and are expected to finally collapse to relatively massive black holes. We find no empirical evidence for any correlation between stellar rotation and chemically homogeneous evolution of massive stars. The apparent dichotomy in evolutionary paths is found to be independent of stellar surface rotation. We report extended star-formation episodes in a quiescent low-density region of the Wing, which is progressing stochastically. We measure the key parameters of stellar feedback and establish the links between stellar feedback parameters and the rates of star formation and supernovae. Our study demonstrates that in metal-poor environments the stellar feedback is dominated by core-collapse supernovae in combination with winds and ionizing radiation supplied by a few of the most massive stars.
Comments: submitted to A&A
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:1903.01762 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:1903.01762v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.01762
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Varsha Ramachandran [view email]
[v1] Tue, 5 Mar 2019 10:40:42 UTC (4,401 KB)
[v2] Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:46:49 UTC (4,412 KB)
[v3] Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:28:10 UTC (4,411 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Spectroscopic analysis of OB stars in the SMC questions the standard picture of massive star evolution, star-formation history and feedback at low metallicity, by Varsha Ramachandran and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-03
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack