Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > nucl-th > arXiv:1902.11290v2

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Nuclear Theory

arXiv:1902.11290v2 (nucl-th)
[Submitted on 28 Feb 2019 (v1), last revised 12 Nov 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:Examination of Flow and Non-Flow Factorization Methods in Small Collision Systems

Authors:S.H. Lim, Q. Hu, R. Belmont, K.K. Hill, J.L. Nagle, D.V. Perepelitsa
View a PDF of the paper titled Examination of Flow and Non-Flow Factorization Methods in Small Collision Systems, by S.H. Lim and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Two particle correlations have been used extensively to study hydrodynamic flow patterns in heavy-ion collisions. In small collision systems, such as $p$$+$$p$ and $p$$+$$A$, where particle multiplicities are much smaller than in $A$$+$$A$ collisions, non-flow effects from jet correlations, momentum conservation, particle decays, etc. can be significant, even when imposing a large pseudorapidity gap between the particles. A number of techniques to subtract the non-flow contribution in two particle correlations have been developed by experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and then used to measure particle flow in $p$$+$$p$ and $p$$+$Pb collisions. Recently, experiments at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) have explored the possibility of adopting these techniques for small collision systems at lower energies. In this paper, we test these techniques using Monte Carlo generators PYTHIA and HIJING, which do not include any collective flow, and AMPT, which does. We find that it is crucial to examine the results of such tests both for correlations integrated over particle transverse momentum $p_T$ and differentially as a function of $p_T$. Our results indicate reasonable non-flow subtraction for $p$$+$$p$ collisions at the highest LHC energies, while failing if applied to $p$$+$$p$ collisions at RHIC. In the case of $p$$+$Au collisions at RHIC, both HIJING and AMPT results indicate a substantial over-subtraction of non-flow for $p_{T}\gtrsim1~{\rm GeV}/c$ and hence an underestimate of elliptic flow.
Comments: 27 pages, 28 figures
Subjects: Nuclear Theory (nucl-th); Nuclear Experiment (nucl-ex)
Cite as: arXiv:1902.11290 [nucl-th]
  (or arXiv:1902.11290v2 [nucl-th] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.11290
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. C 100, 024908 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024908
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Sanghoon Lim [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:49:06 UTC (1,658 KB)
[v2] Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:50:23 UTC (745 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Examination of Flow and Non-Flow Factorization Methods in Small Collision Systems, by S.H. Lim and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
nucl-th
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-02
Change to browse by:
nucl-ex

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack