close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:1902.06122

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition

arXiv:1902.06122 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 16 Feb 2019 (v1), last revised 4 Feb 2020 (this version, v5)]

Title:Power contours: optimising sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human neuroscience

Authors:Daniel H. Baker, Greta Vilidaite, Freya A. Lygo, Anika K. Smith, Tessa R. Flack, Andre D. Gouws, Timothy J. Andrews
View a PDF of the paper titled Power contours: optimising sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human neuroscience, by Daniel H. Baker and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:When designing experimental studies with human participants, experimenters must decide how many trials each participant will complete, as well as how many participants to test. Most discussion of statistical power (the ability of a study design to detect an effect) has focussed on sample size, and assumed sufficient trials. Here we explore the influence of both factors on statistical power, represented as a two-dimensional plot on which iso-power contours can be visualised. We demonstrate the conditions under which the number of trials is particularly important, i.e. when the within-participant variance is large relative to the between-participants variance. We then derive power contour plots using existing data sets for eight experimental paradigms and methodologies (including reaction times, sensory thresholds, fMRI, MEG, and EEG), and provide example code to calculate estimates of the within- and between-participant variance for each method. In all cases, the within-participant variance was larger than the between-participants variance, meaning that the number of trials has a meaningful influence on statistical power in commonly used paradigms. An online tool is provided (this https URL) for generating power contours, from which the optimal combination of trials and participants can be calculated when designing future studies.
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1902.06122 [q-bio.NC]
  (or arXiv:1902.06122v5 [q-bio.NC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.06122
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Psychological Methods (2021), 26(3): 295-314
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000337
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Daniel Baker [view email]
[v1] Sat, 16 Feb 2019 16:30:59 UTC (4,292 KB)
[v2] Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:43:51 UTC (4,293 KB)
[v3] Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:24:19 UTC (4,259 KB)
[v4] Sat, 2 Nov 2019 10:02:27 UTC (4,359 KB)
[v5] Tue, 4 Feb 2020 05:57:53 UTC (4,853 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Power contours: optimising sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human neuroscience, by Daniel H. Baker and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.NC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-02
Change to browse by:
q-bio
stat
stat.ME

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack