Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:1902.04855

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics

arXiv:1902.04855 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 13 Feb 2019]

Title:Elastic constants of graphene: Comparison of empirical potentials and DFT calculations

Authors:Irina V. Lebedeva, Alexander S. Minkin, Andrey M. Popov, Andrey A. Knizhnik
View a PDF of the paper titled Elastic constants of graphene: Comparison of empirical potentials and DFT calculations, by Irina V. Lebedeva and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The capacity of popular classical interatomic potentials to describe elastic properties of graphene is tested. The Tersoff potential, Brenner reactive bond-order potentials REBO-1990, REBO-2000, REBO-2002 and AIREBO as well as LCBOP, PPBE-G, ReaxFF-CHO and ReaxFF-C2013 are considered. Linear and non-linear elastic response of graphene under uniaxial stretching is investigated by static energy calculations. The Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio and high-order elastic moduli are verified against the reference data available from experimental measurements and ab initio studies. The density functional theory calculations are performed to complement the reference data on the effective Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio at small but finite elongations. It is observed that for all the potentials considered, the elastic energy deviates remarkably from the simple quadratic dependence already at elongations of several percent. Nevertheless, LCBOP provides the results consistent with the reference data and thus realistically describes in-plane deformations of graphene. Reasonable agreement is also observed for the computationally cheap PPBE-G potential. REBO-2000, AIREBO and REBO-2002 give a strongly non-linear elastic response with a wrong sign of the third-order elastic modulus and the corresponding results are very far from the reference data. The ReaxFF potentials drastically overestimate the Poisson's ratio. Furthermore, ReaxFF-C2013 shows a number of numerical artefacts at finite elongations. The bending rigidity of graphene is also obtained by static energy calculations for large-diameter carbon nanotubes. The best agreement with the experimental and ab initio data in this case is achieved using the REBO-2000, REBO-2002 and ReaxFF potentials. Therefore, none of the considered potentials adequately describes both in-plane and out-of-plane deformations of graphene.
Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics (cond-mat.mes-hall)
Cite as: arXiv:1902.04855 [cond-mat.mes-hall]
  (or arXiv:1902.04855v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.04855
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 108, 326-338 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2018.11.025
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Irina Lebedeva [view email]
[v1] Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:53:51 UTC (509 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Elastic constants of graphene: Comparison of empirical potentials and DFT calculations, by Irina V. Lebedeva and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Ancillary-file links:

Ancillary files (details):

  • SI.pdf
Current browse context:
cond-mat.mes-hall
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-02
Change to browse by:
cond-mat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack