Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1902.02905

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:1902.02905 (physics)
[Submitted on 8 Feb 2019 (v1), last revised 12 Feb 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:Mobile Artificial Intelligence Technology for Detecting Macula Edema and Subretinal Fluid on OCT Scans: Initial Results from the DATUM alpha Study

Authors:Stephen G. Odaibo, Mikelson MomPremier, Richard Y. Hwang, Salman J. Yousuf, Steven L. Williams, Joshua Grant
View a PDF of the paper titled Mobile Artificial Intelligence Technology for Detecting Macula Edema and Subretinal Fluid on OCT Scans: Initial Results from the DATUM alpha Study, by Stephen G. Odaibo and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Artificial Intelligence (AI) is necessary to address the large and growing deficit in retina and healthcare access globally. And mobile AI diagnostic platforms running in the Cloud may effectively and efficiently distribute such AI capability. Here we sought to evaluate the feasibility of Cloud-based mobile artificial intelligence for detection of retinal disease. And to evaluate the accuracy of a particular such system for detection of subretinal fluid (SRF) and macula edema (ME) on OCT scans. A multicenter retrospective image analysis was conducted in which board-certified ophthalmologists with fellowship training in retina evaluated OCT images of the macula. They noted the presence or absence of ME or SRF, then compared their assessment to that obtained from Fluid Intelligence, a mobile AI app that detects SRF and ME on OCT scans. Investigators consecutively selected retinal OCTs, while making effort to balance the number of scans with retinal fluid and scans without. Exclusion criteria included poor scan quality, ambiguous features, macula holes, retinoschisis, and dense epiretinal membranes. Accuracy in the form of sensitivity and specificity of the AI mobile App was determined by comparing its assessments to those of the retina specialists. At the time of this submission, five centers have completed their initial studies. This consists of a total of 283 OCT scans of which 155 had either ME or SRF ("wet") and 128 did not ("dry"). The sensitivity ranged from 82.5% to 97% with a weighted average of 89.3%. The specificity ranged from 52% to 100% with a weighted average of 81.23%. CONCLUSION: Cloud-based Mobile AI technology is feasible for the detection retinal disease. In particular, Fluid Intelligence (alpha version), is sufficiently accurate as a screening tool for SRF and ME, especially in underserved areas. Further studies and technology development is needed.
Comments: Initial results of the DATUM alpha Study were initially presented on August 13th 2018 in the Keynote Address at the 116th National Medical Association Annual Meeting & Scientific Assembly's New Innovations in Ophthalmology Session. The results were also presented on September 21st 2018 in a Podium Lecture during Alumni Day at the University of Michigan--Ann Arbor Kellogg Eye Center
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1902.02905 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:1902.02905v2 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.02905
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Stephen Odaibo [view email]
[v1] Fri, 8 Feb 2019 01:15:23 UTC (191 KB)
[v2] Tue, 12 Feb 2019 23:50:23 UTC (424 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Mobile Artificial Intelligence Technology for Detecting Macula Edema and Subretinal Fluid on OCT Scans: Initial Results from the DATUM alpha Study, by Stephen G. Odaibo and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-02
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.AI
cs.CV
cs.LG
physics
q-bio
q-bio.NC

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack