close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:1901.05659

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Soft Condensed Matter

arXiv:1901.05659 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 17 Jan 2019 (v1), last revised 9 Jul 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:A Comparative Study of a Class of Mean Field Theories of the Glass Transition

Authors:Indranil Saha, Manoj Kumar Nandi, Chandan Dasgupta, Sarika Maitra Bhattacharyya
View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparative Study of a Class of Mean Field Theories of the Glass Transition, by Indranil Saha and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In a recently developed microscopic mean field theory, we have shown that the dynamics of a system, when described only in terms of its pair structure, can predict the correct dynamical transition temperature. Further, the theory predicted the difference in dynamics of two systems (the Lennard-Jones and the WCA) despite them having quite similar structures. This is in contrast to the Schweizer-Saltzman (SS) formalism which predicted the dynamics of these two systems to be similar. The two theories although similar in spirit have certain differences. Here we present a comparative study of these two formalisms to find the origin of the difference in their predictive power. We show that not only the dynamics in the potential energy surface, as described by our earlier study, but also that in the free energy surface, like in the SS theory, can predict the correct dynamical transition temperature. Even an approximate one component version of our theory, similar to the system used in the SS theory, can predict the transition temperature reasonably well. According to our analysis, the absence of the Vineyard approximation in the SS formalism led it to predict similar dynamics for the two systems. Interestingly, we show here that despite the above mentioned shortcomings the SS theory can actually predict the correct transition temperatures. Thus microscopic mean field theories of this class which express dynamics in terms of the pair structure of the liquid while being unable to predict the actual dynamics of the system are successful in predicting the correct dynamical transition temperature.
Comments: 12 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Soft Condensed Matter (cond-mat.soft)
Cite as: arXiv:1901.05659 [cond-mat.soft]
  (or arXiv:1901.05659v2 [cond-mat.soft] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.05659
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ab3115
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Sarika Maitra Bhattacharyya [view email]
[v1] Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:32:05 UTC (41 KB)
[v2] Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:47:32 UTC (43 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparative Study of a Class of Mean Field Theories of the Glass Transition, by Indranil Saha and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cond-mat.soft
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2019-01
Change to browse by:
cond-mat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack