Computer Science > Information Theory
[Submitted on 7 Jan 2019 (v1), last revised 10 Jan 2019 (this version, v2)]
Title:The Effect of Introducing Redundancy in a Probabilistic Forwarding Protocol
View PDFAbstract:This paper is concerned with the problem of broadcasting information from a source node to every node in an ad-hoc network. Flooding, as a broadcast mechanism, involves each node forwarding any packet it receives to all its neighbours. This results in excessive transmissions and thus a high energy expenditure overall. Probabilistic forwarding or gossiping involves each node forwarding a received packet to all its neighbours only with a certain probability $p$. In this paper, we study the effect of introducing redundancy, in the form of coded packets, into a probabilistic forwarding protocol. Specifically, we assume that the source node has $k$ data packets to broadcast, which are encoded into $n \ge k$ coded packets, such that any $k$ of these coded packets are sufficient to recover the original $k$ data packets. Our interest is in determining the minimum forwarding probability $p$ for a "successful broadcast", which we take to be the event that the expected fraction of network nodes that receive at least $k$ of the $n$ coded packets is close to 1. We examine, via simulations and analysis of a number of different network topologies (e.g., trees, grids, random geometric graphs), how this minimum forwarding probability, and correspondingly, the expected total number of packet transmissions varies with the amount of redundancy added. Our simulation results indicate that over network topologies that are highly connected, the introduction of redundancy into the probabilistic forwarding protocol is useful, as it can significantly reduce the expected total number of transmissions needed for a successful broadcast. On the other hand, for trees, our analysis shows that the expected total number of transmissions needed increases with redundancy.
Submission history
From: Navin Kashyap [view email][v1] Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:37:50 UTC (375 KB)
[v2] Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:06:55 UTC (375 KB)
Current browse context:
cs.IT
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.