Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1812.10635

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1812.10635 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 27 Dec 2018]

Title:CMB lensing bi-spectrum: assessing analytical predictions against full-sky lensing simulations

Authors:Toshiya Namikawa, Benjamin Bose, François R. Bouchet, Ryuichi Takahashi, Atsushi Taruya
View a PDF of the paper titled CMB lensing bi-spectrum: assessing analytical predictions against full-sky lensing simulations, by Toshiya Namikawa and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing is an integrated effect whose kernel is greater than half the peak value in the range $1<z<5$. Measuring this effect offers a powerful tool to probe the large-scale structure of the Universe at high redshifts. With the increasing precision of ongoing CMB surveys, other statistics than the lensing power spectrum, in particular the lensing bi-spectrum, will be measured at high statistical significance. This will provide ways to improve the constraints on cosmological models and lift degeneracies. Following on an earlier paper, we test analytical predictions of the CMB lensing bi-spectrum against full-sky lensing simulations, and discuss their validity and limitation in detail. The tree-level prediction of perturbation theory agrees with the simulation only up to $\ell\sim 200$, but the one-loop order allows capturing the simulation results up to $\ell\sim 600$. We also show that analytical predictions based on fitting formulas for the matter bi-spectrum agree reasonably well with simulation results, although the precision of the agreement depends on the configurations and scales considered. For instance, the agreement is at the $10\%$-level for the equilateral configuration at multipoles up to $\ell\sim2000$, but the difference in the squeezed limit raises to more than a factor of two at $\ell\sim2000$. This discrepancy appears to come from limitations in the fitting formula of the matter bi-spectrum. We also find that the analytical prediction for the post-Born correction to the bi-spectrum is in good agreement with the simulation. We conclude by discussing the bi-spectrum prediction in some theories of modified gravity.
Comments: 18 pages, 14 figures
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Report number: YITP-18-127
Cite as: arXiv:1812.10635 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1812.10635v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.10635
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 99, 063511 (2019)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063511
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Toshiya Namikawa [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Dec 2018 05:48:42 UTC (1,562 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled CMB lensing bi-spectrum: assessing analytical predictions against full-sky lensing simulations, by Toshiya Namikawa and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-12
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack