Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:1810.10984v1

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:1810.10984v1 (math)
[Submitted on 25 Oct 2018 (this version), latest version 1 Oct 2019 (v4)]

Title:Improving the condition number of estimated covariance matrices

Authors:Jemima M. Tabeart, Sarah L. Dance, Amos S. Lawless, Nancy K. Nichols, Joanne A. Waller
View a PDF of the paper titled Improving the condition number of estimated covariance matrices, by Jemima M. Tabeart and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:High dimensional error covariance matrices are used to weight the contribution of observation and background terms in data assimilation procedures. As error covariance matrices are often obtained by sampling methods, the resulting matrices are often degenerate or ill-conditioned, making them too expensive to use in practice. In order to combat these problems, reconditioning methods are used. In this paper we present new theory for two existing methods that can be used to reduce the condition number of (or 'recondition') any covariance matrix: ridge regression, and the minimum eigenvalue method. These methods are used in practice at numerical weather prediction centres, but their theoretical impact on the covariance matrix itself is not well understood. Here we address this by investigating the impact of reconditioning on variances and covariances of a general covariance matrix in both a theoretical and practical setting. Improved theoretical understanding provides guidance to users with respect to both method selection, and choice of target condition number. The new theory shows that, for the same target condition number, both methods increase variances compared to the original matrix, and that the ridge regression method results in a larger increase to the variances compared to the original matrix than the minimum eigenvalue method for any covariance matrix. We also prove that the ridge regression method strictly decreases the absolute value of off-diagonal correlations. We apply the reconditioning methods to two examples: a simple general correlation function, and an error covariance matrix arising from interchannel correlations. The minimum eigenvalue method results in smaller overall changes to the correlation matrix than the ridge regression method, but in contrast can increase off-diagonal correlations.
Comments: 14 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1810.10984 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:1810.10984v1 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.10984
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jemima Tabeart [view email]
[v1] Thu, 25 Oct 2018 17:18:11 UTC (158 KB)
[v2] Mon, 27 May 2019 13:26:31 UTC (163 KB)
[v3] Fri, 16 Aug 2019 08:45:52 UTC (212 KB)
[v4] Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:29:52 UTC (212 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Improving the condition number of estimated covariance matrices, by Jemima M. Tabeart and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-10
Change to browse by:
math
stat
stat.ME

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack