Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1810.07374

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Logic in Computer Science

arXiv:1810.07374 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Oct 2018]

Title:Validating Back-links of FOLID Cyclic Pre-proofs

Authors:Sorin Stratulat (Université de Lorraine)
View a PDF of the paper titled Validating Back-links of FOLID Cyclic Pre-proofs, by Sorin Stratulat (Universit\'e de Lorraine)
View PDF
Abstract:Cyclic pre-proofs can be represented as sets of finite tree derivations with back-links. In the frame of the first-order logic with inductive definitions, the nodes of the tree derivations are labelled by sequents and the back-links connect particular terminal nodes, referred to as buds, to other nodes labelled by a same sequent. However, only some back-links can constitute sound pre-proofs. Previously, it has been shown that special ordering and derivability conditions, defined along the minimal cycles of the digraph representing a particular normal form of the cyclic pre-proof, are sufficient for validating the back-links. In that approach, a same constraint could be checked several times when processing different minimal cycles, hence one may require additional recording mechanisms to avoid redundant computation in order to downgrade the time complexity to polynomial.
We present a new approach that does not need to process minimal cycles. It based on a normal form that allows to define the validation conditions by taking into account only the root-bud paths from the non-singleton strongly connected components of its digraph.
Comments: In Proceedings CL&C 2018, arXiv:1810.05392
Subjects: Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)
ACM classes: F.4.1
Cite as: arXiv:1810.07374 [cs.LO]
  (or arXiv:1810.07374v1 [cs.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.07374
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: EPTCS 281, 2018, pp. 39-53
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.281.4
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: EPTCS [view email] [via EPTCS proxy]
[v1] Wed, 17 Oct 2018 03:24:08 UTC (419 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Validating Back-links of FOLID Cyclic Pre-proofs, by Sorin Stratulat (Universit\'e de Lorraine)
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-10
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack