Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1809.09684

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

arXiv:1809.09684 (cs)
[Submitted on 25 Sep 2018]

Title:LOBO -- Evaluation of Generalization Deficiencies in Twitter Bot Classifiers

Authors:Juan Echeverría, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nicolas Kourtellis, Ilias Leontiadis, Gianluca Stringhini, Shi Zhou
View a PDF of the paper titled LOBO -- Evaluation of Generalization Deficiencies in Twitter Bot Classifiers, by Juan Echeverr\'ia and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Botnets in online social networks are increasingly often affecting the regular flow of discussion, attacking regular users and their posts, spamming them with irrelevant or offensive content, and even manipulating the popularity of messages and accounts. Researchers and cybercriminals are involved in an arms race, and new and updated botnets designed to defeat current detection systems are constantly developed, rendering such detection systems obsolete.
In this paper, we motivate the need for a generalized evaluation in Twitter bot detection and propose a methodology to evaluate bot classifiers by testing them on unseen bot classes. We show that this methodology is empirically robust, using bot classes of varying sizes and characteristics and reaching similar results, and argue that methods trained and tested on single bot classes or datasets might not able to generalize to new bot classes. We train one such classifier on over 200,000 data points and show that it achieves over 97% accuracy. The data used to train and test this classifier includes some of the largest and most varied collections of bots used in literature. We then test this theoretically sound classifier using our methodology, highlighting that it does not generalize well to unseen bot classes. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results, and reasons why some bot classes are easier and faster to detect than others.
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.09684 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:1809.09684v1 [cs.CR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.09684
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Computer Security Ap- plications Conference (ACSAC 2018)

Submission history

From: Emiliano De Cristofaro [view email]
[v1] Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:57:46 UTC (225 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled LOBO -- Evaluation of Generalization Deficiencies in Twitter Bot Classifiers, by Juan Echeverr\'ia and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SI

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Juan Echeverría
Emiliano De Cristofaro
Nicolas Kourtellis
Ilias Leontiadis
Gianluca Stringhini
…
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack