Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:1809.09608

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Logic

arXiv:1809.09608 (math)
[Submitted on 25 Sep 2018 (v1), last revised 5 Sep 2021 (this version, v3)]

Title:A note on strong axiomatization of Gödel Justification Logic

Authors:Nicholas Pischke
View a PDF of the paper titled A note on strong axiomatization of G\"odel Justification Logic, by Nicholas Pischke
View PDF
Abstract:Justification logics are special kinds of modal logics which provide a framework for reasoning about epistemic justifications. For this, they extend classical boolean propositional logic by a family of necessity-style modal operators "t:", indexed over t by a corresponding set of justification terms, which thus explicitly encode the justification for the necessity assertion in the syntax. With these operators, one can therefore not only reason about modal effects on propositions but also about dynamics inside the justifications themselves. We replace this classical boolean base with Gödel logic, one of the three most prominent fuzzy logics, i.e. special instances of many-valued logics, taking values in the unit interval [0,1], which are intended to model inference under vagueness. We extend the canonical possible-world semantics for justification logic to this fuzzy realm by considering fuzzy accessibility- and evaluation-functions evaluated over the minimum t-norm and establish strong completeness theorems for various fuzzy analogies of prominent extensions for basic justification logic.
Comments: 20 pages
Subjects: Logic (math.LO)
MSC classes: 03B52, 03B45
Cite as: arXiv:1809.09608 [math.LO]
  (or arXiv:1809.09608v3 [math.LO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.09608
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Studia Logica 108(4) 2020, pp. 687-724
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-019-09871-4
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Nicholas Pischke [view email]
[v1] Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:39:40 UTC (21 KB)
[v2] Fri, 26 Oct 2018 19:52:07 UTC (21 KB)
[v3] Sun, 5 Sep 2021 18:04:58 UTC (25 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A note on strong axiomatization of G\"odel Justification Logic, by Nicholas Pischke
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.LO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
math

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack