Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1809.08239

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Astrophysics of Galaxies

arXiv:1809.08239 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 21 Sep 2018 (v1), last revised 7 Jan 2019 (this version, v2)]

Title:The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations

Authors:Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Gregory F. Snyder, Jennifer M. Lotz, Dylan Nelson, Annalisa Pillepich, Volker Springel, Shy Genel, Rainer Weinberger, Sandro Tacchella, Ruediger Pakmor, Paul Torrey, Federico Marinacci, Mark Vogelsberger, Lars Hernquist, David A. Thilker
View a PDF of the paper titled The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations, by Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez and 13 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We have generated synthetic images of $\sim$27,000 galaxies from the IllustrisTNG and the original Illustris hydrodynamic cosmological simulations, designed to match Pan-STARRS observations of $\log_{10}(M_{\ast}/{\rm M}_{\odot}) \approx 9.8$-$11.3$ galaxies at $z \approx 0.05$. Most of our synthetic images were created with the SKIRT radiative transfer code, including the effects of dust attenuation and scattering, and performing the radiative transfer directly on the Voronoi mesh used by the simulations themselves. We have analysed both our synthetic and real Pan-STARRS images with the newly developed $\tt{statmorph}$ code, which calculates non-parametric morphological diagnostics -- including the Gini-$M_{20}$ and concentration-asymmetry-smoothness (CAS) statistics -- and performs two-dimensional Sérsic fits. Overall, we find that the optical morphologies of IllustrisTNG galaxies are in good agreement with observations, and represent a substantial improvement compared to the original Illustris simulation. In particular, the locus of the Gini-$M_{20}$ diagram is consistent with that inferred from observations, while the median trends with stellar mass of all the morphological, size and shape parameters considered in this work lie within the $\sim$1$\sigma$ scatter of the observational trends. However, the IllustrisTNG model has some difficulty with more stringent tests, such as producing a strong morphology-colour relation. This results in a somewhat higher fraction of red discs and blue spheroids compared to observations. Similarly, the morphology-size relation is problematic: while observations show that discs tend to be larger than spheroids at a fixed stellar mass, such a trend is not present in IllustrisTNG.
Comments: 21 pages, 11 figures. Published in MNRAS. Code available at this https URL
Subjects: Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.08239 [astro-ph.GA]
  (or arXiv:1809.08239v2 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.08239
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: MNRAS, Volume 483, Issue 3, 1 March 2019, Pages 4140-4159
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3345
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez [view email]
[v1] Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:00:00 UTC (1,451 KB)
[v2] Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:00:00 UTC (1,452 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations, by Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez and 13 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.GA
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack