Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1809.07928

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Networking and Internet Architecture

arXiv:1809.07928 (cs)
[Submitted on 21 Sep 2018 (v1), last revised 4 Apr 2020 (this version, v4)]

Title:A Prospect Theoretic Approach for Trust Management in IoT Networks under Manipulation Attacks

Authors:Mehrdad Salimitari, Shameek Bhattacharjee, Mainak Chatterjee, Yaser P. Fallah
View a PDF of the paper titled A Prospect Theoretic Approach for Trust Management in IoT Networks under Manipulation Attacks, by Mehrdad Salimitari and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:As Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber-Physical systems become more ubiquitous and an integral part of our daily lives, it is important that we are able to trust the data aggregate from such systems. However, the interpretation of trustworthiness is contextual and varies according to the risk tolerance attitude of the concerned application and varying levels of uncertainty associated with the evidence upon which trust models act. Hence, the data integrity scoring mechanisms should have provisions to adapt to varying risk attitudes and uncertainties. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian inference model and a prospect theoretic framework for data integrity scoring that quantify the trustworthiness of data collected from IoT devices in the presence of an adversaries who manipulate the data. We consider an imperfect anomaly monitoring mechanism that monitors the data being sent from each device and classifies the outcome as not compromised, compromised, and cannot be inferred. These outcomes are conceptualized as a multinomial hypothesis of a Bayesian inference model with three parameters which are then used for calculating a utility value on how reliable the aggregate data is. We use a prospect theory inspired approach to quantify this data integrity score and evaluate the trustworthiness of the aggregate data from the IoT framework. Furthermore, we also model the system using the traditionally used expected utility theory and compare the results with that obtained using prospect theory. As decisions are based on how the data is fused, we propose two measuring models: one optimistic and another conservative. The proposed framework is validated using extensive simulation experiments. We show how data integrity scores vary under a variety of system factors like attack intensity and inaccurate detection.
Comments: This paper is accepted for publication in ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN)
Subjects: Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.07928 [cs.NI]
  (or arXiv:1809.07928v4 [cs.NI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.07928
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 16, 3, Article 26 (May 2020)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3392058
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Mehrdad Salimitari [view email]
[v1] Fri, 21 Sep 2018 03:16:00 UTC (551 KB)
[v2] Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:35:45 UTC (601 KB)
[v3] Sun, 29 Mar 2020 03:48:54 UTC (624 KB)
[v4] Sat, 4 Apr 2020 06:59:32 UTC (624 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Prospect Theoretic Approach for Trust Management in IoT Networks under Manipulation Attacks, by Mehrdad Salimitari and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.NI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Mehrdad Salimitari
Shameek Bhattacharjee
Mainak Chatterjee
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack