close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:1809.06216

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Neurons and Cognition

arXiv:1809.06216 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 12 Sep 2018 (v1), last revised 9 Nov 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Large-scale validation of an automatic EEG arousal detection algorithm using different heterogeneous databases

Authors:Diego Alvarez-Estevez, Isaac Fernández-Varela
View a PDF of the paper titled Large-scale validation of an automatic EEG arousal detection algorithm using different heterogeneous databases, by Diego Alvarez-Estevez and 1 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:$\textbf{Objective}$: To assess the validity of an automatic EEG arousal detection algorithm using large patient samples and different heterogeneous databases
$\textbf{Methods}$: Automatic scorings were confronted with results from human expert scorers on a total of 2768 full-night PSG recordings obtained from two different databases. Of them, 472 recordings were obtained during clinical routine at our sleep center and were subdivided into two subgroups of 220 (HMC-S) and 252 (HMC-M) recordings each, attending to the procedure followed by the clinical expert during the visual review (semi-automatic or purely manual, respectively). In addition, 2296 recordings from the public SHHS-2 database were evaluated against the respective manual expert scorings.
$\textbf{Results}$: Event-by-event epoch-based validation resulted in an overall Cohen kappa agreement K = 0.600 (HMC-S), 0.559 (HMC-M), and 0.573 (SHHS-2). Estimated inter-scorer variability on the datasets was, respectively, K = 0.594, 0.561 and 0.543. Analyses of the corresponding Arousal Index scores showed associated automatic-human repeatability indices ranging in 0.693-0.771 (HMC-S), 0.646-0.791 (HMC-M), and 0.759-0.791 (SHHS-2).
$\textbf{Conclusions}$: Large-scale validation of our automatic EEG arousal detector on different databases has shown robust performance and good generalization results comparable to the expected levels of human agreement. Special emphasis has been put on allowing reproducibility of the results and implementation of our method has been made accessible online as open source code
Comments: 13 pages, 1 figure, 7 tables; typos corrected; format improved
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1809.06216 [q-bio.NC]
  (or arXiv:1809.06216v2 [q-bio.NC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.06216
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2019.01.025
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Diego Alvarez-Estevez [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:55:42 UTC (783 KB)
[v2] Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:26:24 UTC (844 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Large-scale validation of an automatic EEG arousal detection algorithm using different heterogeneous databases, by Diego Alvarez-Estevez and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.NC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
q-bio

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack