Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:1809.04613

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Molecular Networks

arXiv:1809.04613 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 12 Sep 2018]

Title:Discrepancies between extinction events and boundary equilibria in reaction networks

Authors:David Anderson, Daniele Cappelletti
View a PDF of the paper titled Discrepancies between extinction events and boundary equilibria in reaction networks, by David Anderson and Daniele Cappelletti
View PDF
Abstract:Reaction networks are mathematical models of interacting chemical species that are primarily used in biochemistry. There are two modeling regimes that are typically used, one of which is deterministic and one that is stochastic. In particular, the deterministic model consists of an autonomous system of differential equations, whereas the stochastic system is a continuous time Markov chain. Connections between the two modeling regimes have been studied since the seminal paper by Kurtz (1972), where the deterministic model is shown to be a limit of a properly rescaled stochastic model over compact time intervals. Further, more recent studies have connected the long-term behaviors of the two models when the reaction network satisfies certain graphical properties, such as weak reversibility and a deficiency of zero.
These connections have led some to conjecture a link between the long-term behavior of the two models exists, in some sense. In particular, one is tempted to believe that positive recurrence of all states for the stochastic model implies the existence of positive equilibria in the deterministic setting, and that boundary equilibria of the deterministic model imply the occurrence of an extinction event in the stochastic setting. We prove in this paper that these implications do not hold in general, even if restricting the analysis to networks that are bimolecular and that conserve the total mass. In particular, we disprove the implications in the special case of models that have absolute concentration robustness, thus answering in the negative a conjecture stated in the literature in 2014.
Subjects: Molecular Networks (q-bio.MN); Dynamical Systems (math.DS); Probability (math.PR)
MSC classes: 60J27, 60J28, 60G10, 37N25, 92C42, 37C10
Cite as: arXiv:1809.04613 [q-bio.MN]
  (or arXiv:1809.04613v1 [q-bio.MN] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1809.04613
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Daniele Cappelletti [view email]
[v1] Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:01:37 UTC (20 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Discrepancies between extinction events and boundary equilibria in reaction networks, by David Anderson and Daniele Cappelletti
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.MN
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-09
Change to browse by:
math
math.DS
math.PR
q-bio

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack