Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1808.09470

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:1808.09470 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 28 Aug 2018]

Title:Comparison of theoretical and observed Ca~{\sc ii}~8542 Stokes profiles in quiet regions at the centre of the solar disc

Authors:Jan Jurcak, Jiri Stepan, Javier Trujillo Bueno, Michele Bianda
View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of theoretical and observed Ca~{\sc ii}~8542 Stokes profiles in quiet regions at the centre of the solar disc, by Jan Jurcak and Jiri Stepan and Javier Trujillo Bueno and Michele Bianda
View PDF
Abstract:Interpreting the Stokes profiles observed in quiet regions of the solar chromosphere is a challenging task. The Stokes Q and U profiles are dominated by the scattering polarisation and the Hanle effect, and these processes can only be correctly quantified if 3D radiative transfer effects are taken into account. Forward-modelling of the intensity and polarisation of spectral lines using a 3D model atmosphere is a suitable approach in order to statistically compare the theoretical and observed line profiles. Our aim is to present novel observations of the Ca 8542 line profiles in a quiet region at the centre of the solar disc and to quantitatively compare them with the theoretical Stokes profiles. We aim at estimating the reliability of the 3D model atmosphere using not only the line intensity but the full vector of Stokes parameters. We used data obtained with the ZIMPOL instrument at the IRSOL and compared the observations with the theoretical profiles computed with the PORTA radiative transfer code, using as solar model atmosphere a 3D snapshot taken from a radiation-magnetohydrodynamics simulation. The synthetic profiles were degraded to match the instrument and observing conditions. The degraded theoretical profiles of the Ca 8542 line are qualitatively similar to the observed ones. We confirm that there is a fundamental difference in the widths of all Stokes profiles: the observed lines are wider than the theoretical lines. We find that the amplitudes of the observed profiles are larger than those of the theoretical ones, which suggests that the symmetry breaking effects in the solar chromosphere are stronger than in the model atmosphere. This means that the isosurfaces of temperature, velocity, and magnetic field strength and orientation are more corrugated in the solar chromosphere than in the currently available 3D radiation-magnetohydrodynamics simulation.
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR)
Cite as: arXiv:1808.09470 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:1808.09470v1 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.09470
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: A&A 619, A60 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732265
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jan Jurcak [view email]
[v1] Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:03:45 UTC (5,091 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Comparison of theoretical and observed Ca~{\sc ii}~8542 Stokes profiles in quiet regions at the centre of the solar disc, by Jan Jurcak and Jiri Stepan and Javier Trujillo Bueno and Michele Bianda
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-08
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack