Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1806.11153

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:1806.11153 (stat)
[Submitted on 28 Jun 2018]

Title:Evaluation of adaptive treatment strategies in an observational study where time-varying covariates are not monitored systematically

Authors:Noémi Kreif, Oleg Sofrygin, Julie Schmittdiel, Alyce Adams, Richard Grant, Zheng Zhu, Mark van der Laan, Romain Neugebauer
View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluation of adaptive treatment strategies in an observational study where time-varying covariates are not monitored systematically, by No\'emi Kreif and 7 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In studies based on electronic health records (EHR), the frequency of covariate monitoring can vary by covariate type, across patients, and over time. This can lead to major challenges: first, the difference in monitoring protocols may invalidate the extrapolation of study results obtained in one population to the other, and second, monitoring can act as a time-varying confounder of the causal effect of a time-varying treatment on the outcomes of interest. This paper demonstrates how to account for non-systematic covariate monitoring when evaluating dynamic treatment interventions, and how to evaluate joint dynamic treatment-censoring and static monitoring interventions, in a real world, EHR-based, comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of patients with type II diabetes mellitus. First, we show that the effects of dynamic treatment-censoring regimes can be identified by including indicators of monitoring events in the adjustment set. Second, we demonstrate the poor performance of the standard inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimator of the effects of joint treatment-censoring-monitoring interventions, due to a large decrease in data support resulting in a large increase in standard errors and concerns over finite-sample bias from near-violations of the positivity assumption for the monitoring process. Finally, we detail an alternate IPW estimator of the effects of these interventions using the No Direct Effect assumption. We demonstrate that this estimator can result in improved efficiency but at the cost of increased bias concerns over structural near-violations of the positivity assumption for the treatment process. To conclude, this paper develops and illustrates new tools that researchers can exploit to appropriately account for non-systematic covariate monitoring in CER, and to ask new causal questions about the joint effects of treatment and monitoring interventions.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1806.11153 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1806.11153v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.11153
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Noemi Kreif [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:35:22 UTC (556 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluation of adaptive treatment strategies in an observational study where time-varying covariates are not monitored systematically, by No\'emi Kreif and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-06
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack