Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1805.04473

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:1805.04473 (cs)
[Submitted on 11 May 2018]

Title:Statically Verifying Continuous Integration Configurations

Authors:Mark Santolucito, Jialu Zhang, Ennan Zhai, Ruzica Piskac
View a PDF of the paper titled Statically Verifying Continuous Integration Configurations, by Mark Santolucito and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Continuous Integration (CI) testing is a popular software development technique that allows developers to easily check that their code can build successfully and pass tests across various system environments. In order to use a CI platform, a developer must include a set of configuration files to a code repository for specifying build conditions. Incorrect configuration settings lead to CI build failures, which can take hours to run, wasting valuable developer time and delaying product release dates. Debugging CI configurations is challenging because users must manage configurations for the build across many system environments, to which they may not have local access. Thus, the only way to check a CI configuration is to push a commit and wait for the build result. To address this problem, we present the first approach, VeriCI, for statically checking for errors in a given CI configuration before the developer pushes a commit to build on the CI server. Our key insight is that the repositories in a CI environment contain lists of build histories which offer the time-aware repository build status. Driven by this insight, we introduce the Misclassification Guided Abstraction Refinement (MiGAR) loop that automates part of the learning process across the heterogeneous build environments in CI. We then use decision tree learning to generate constraints on the CI configuration that must hold for a build to succeed by training on a large history of continuous integration repository build results. We evaluate VeriCI on real-world data from GitHub and find that we have 83% accuracy of predicting a build failure.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:1805.04473 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:1805.04473v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.04473
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Mark Santolucito [view email]
[v1] Fri, 11 May 2018 16:21:43 UTC (591 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Statically Verifying Continuous Integration Configurations, by Mark Santolucito and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-05
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Mark Santolucito
Jialu Zhang
Ennan Zhai
Ruzica Piskac
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack