close this message
arXiv smileybones

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

Work on one of the world's most important websites and make an impact on open science.

View Jobs
Skip to main content
Cornell University

arXiv Is Hiring a DevOps Engineer

View Jobs
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > hep-ph > arXiv:1805.00020

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

arXiv:1805.00020 (hep-ph)
[Submitted on 30 Apr 2018 (v1), last revised 26 Jul 2018 (this version, v4)]

Title:A Guide to Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning

Authors:Johann Brehmer, Kyle Cranmer, Gilles Louppe, Juan Pavez
View a PDF of the paper titled A Guide to Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning, by Johann Brehmer and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We develop, discuss, and compare several inference techniques to constrain theory parameters in collider experiments. By harnessing the latent-space structure of particle physics processes, we extract extra information from the simulator. This augmented data can be used to train neural networks that precisely estimate the likelihood ratio. The new methods scale well to many observables and high-dimensional parameter spaces, do not require any approximations of the parton shower and detector response, and can be evaluated in microseconds. Using weak-boson-fusion Higgs production as an example process, we compare the performance of several techniques. The best results are found for likelihood ratio estimators trained with extra information about the score, the gradient of the log likelihood function with respect to the theory parameters. The score also provides sufficient statistics that contain all the information needed for inference in the neighborhood of the Standard Model. These methods enable us to put significantly stronger bounds on effective dimension-six operators than the traditional approach based on histograms. They also outperform generic machine learning methods that do not make use of the particle physics structure, demonstrating their potential to substantially improve the new physics reach of the LHC legacy results.
Comments: See also the companion publication "Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning" at arXiv:1805.00013, a brief introduction presenting the key ideas. The code for these studies is available at this https URL . v2: Added references. v3: Improved description of algorithms, added references. v4: Clarified text, added references
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1805.00020 [hep-ph]
  (or arXiv:1805.00020v4 [hep-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.00020
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 98, 052004 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.052004
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Johann Brehmer Mr [view email]
[v1] Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:00:01 UTC (1,267 KB)
[v2] Sat, 12 May 2018 18:31:44 UTC (1,267 KB)
[v3] Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:57:01 UTC (1,268 KB)
[v4] Thu, 26 Jul 2018 19:03:59 UTC (1,268 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Guide to Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning, by Johann Brehmer and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
hep-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-05
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.data-an
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack