Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > quant-ph > arXiv:1804.01122

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantum Physics

arXiv:1804.01122 (quant-ph)
[Submitted on 3 Apr 2018 (v1), last revised 10 Sep 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:From randomized benchmarking experiments to gateset circuit fidelity: how to interpret randomized benchmarking decay parameters

Authors:Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Kristine Boone, Joel J. Wallman, Joseph Emerson
View a PDF of the paper titled From randomized benchmarking experiments to gateset circuit fidelity: how to interpret randomized benchmarking decay parameters, by Arnaud Carignan-Dugas and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols have become an essential tool for providing a meaningful partial characterization of experimental quantum operations. While the RB decay rate is known to enable estimates of the average fidelity of those operations under gate-independent Markovian noise, under gate-dependent noise this rate is more difficult to interpret rigorously. In this paper, we prove that single-qubit RB decay parameter $p$ coincides with the decay parameter of the gate-set circuit fidelity, a novel figure of merit which characterizes the expected average fidelity over arbitrary circuits of operations from the gate-set. We also prove that, in the limit of high-fidelity single-qubit experiments, the possible alarming disconnect between the average gate fidelity and RB experimental results is simply explained by a basis mismatch between the gates and the state-preparation and measurement procedures, that is, to a unitary degree of freedom in labeling the Pauli matrices. Based on numerical evidence and physically motivated arguments, we conjecture that these results also hold for higher dimensions.
Comments: 10 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1804.01122 [quant-ph]
  (or arXiv:1804.01122v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.01122
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: 2018 New J. Phys. 20 092001
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aadcc7
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Arnaud Carignan-Dugas [view email]
[v1] Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:32:07 UTC (167 KB)
[v2] Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:14:23 UTC (170 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled From randomized benchmarking experiments to gateset circuit fidelity: how to interpret randomized benchmarking decay parameters, by Arnaud Carignan-Dugas and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
quant-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-04

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack