Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1803.09049

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Plasma Physics

arXiv:1803.09049 (physics)
[Submitted on 24 Mar 2018 (v1), last revised 28 Mar 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:The Parallel Boundary Condition for Turbulence Simulations in Low Magnetic Shear Devices

Authors:Mike F. Martin, Matt Landreman, Pavlos Xanthopoulos, Noah R. Mandell, William Dorland
View a PDF of the paper titled The Parallel Boundary Condition for Turbulence Simulations in Low Magnetic Shear Devices, by Mike F. Martin and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Flux tube simulations of plasma turbulence in stellarators and tokamaks typically employ coordinates which are aligned with the magnetic field lines. Anisotropic turbulent fluctuations can be represented in such field-aligned coordinates very efficiently, but the resulting non-trivial boundary conditions involve all three spatial directions, and must be handled with care. The standard "twist-and-shift" formulation of the boundary conditions [Beer, Cowley, Hammett \textit{Phys. Plasmas} \textbf{2}, 2687 (1995)] was derived assuming axisymmetry and is widely used because it is efficient, as long as the global magnetic shear is not too small. A generalization of this formulation is presented, appropriate for studies of non-axisymmetric, stellarator-symmetric configurations, as well as for axisymmetric configurations with small global shear. The key idea is to replace the "twist" of the standard approach (which accounts only for global shear) with the integrated local shear. This generalization allows one significantly more freedom when choosing the extent of the simulation domain in each direction, without losing the natural efficiency of field-line-following coordinates. It also corrects errors associated with naive application of axisymmetric boundary conditions to non-axisymmetric configurations. Simulations of stellarator turbulence that employ the generalized boundary conditions require much less resolution than simulations that use the (incorrect, axisymmetric) boundary conditions. We also demonstrate the surprising result that (at least in some cases) an easily implemented but manifestly incorrect formulation of the boundary conditions does {\it not} change important predicted quantities, such as the turbulent heat flux.
Subjects: Plasma Physics (physics.plasm-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1803.09049 [physics.plasm-ph]
  (or arXiv:1803.09049v2 [physics.plasm-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.09049
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 095008 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aad38a
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Mike Martin [view email]
[v1] Sat, 24 Mar 2018 03:30:19 UTC (2,575 KB)
[v2] Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:52:24 UTC (2,575 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Parallel Boundary Condition for Turbulence Simulations in Low Magnetic Shear Devices, by Mike F. Martin and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.plasm-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-03
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack