Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1802.06995

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Methodology

arXiv:1802.06995 (stat)
[Submitted on 20 Feb 2018]

Title:How to analyze data in a factorial design? An extensive simulation study

Authors:Maria Umlauft
View a PDF of the paper titled How to analyze data in a factorial design? An extensive simulation study, by Maria Umlauft
View PDF
Abstract:Factorial designs are frequently used in different fields of science, e.g. psychological, medical or biometric studies. Standard approaches, as the ANOVA $F$-test, make different assumptions on the distribution of the error terms, the variances or the sample sizes in the different groups. Because of time constraints or a lack of statistical background, many users do not check these assumptions; enhancing the risk of potentially inflated type-$I$ error rates or a substantial loss of power. It is the aim of the present paper, to give an overview of different methods without such restrictive assumptions and to identify situations in which one method is superior compared to others. In particular, after summarizing their underlying assumptions, the different approaches are compared within extensive simulations. To also address the current discussion about redefining the statistical significance level, we also included simulations for the 0.5\% level.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:1802.06995 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1802.06995v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.06995
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Maria Umlauft [view email]
[v1] Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:31:59 UTC (3,247 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled How to analyze data in a factorial design? An extensive simulation study, by Maria Umlauft
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ME
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2018-02
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack