Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1712.05046

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

arXiv:1712.05046 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 13 Dec 2017 (v1), last revised 11 Jul 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Measuring Model-independent Masses and Radii of Single-Lined Eclipsing Binaries: Analytic Precision Estimates

Authors:Daniel J. Stevens, B. Scott Gaudi, Keivan G. Stassun
View a PDF of the paper titled Measuring Model-independent Masses and Radii of Single-Lined Eclipsing Binaries: Analytic Precision Estimates, by Daniel J. Stevens and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We derive analytic estimates for the ability with which one can obtain precise, empirical stellar masses and radii via single-lined eclipsing binaries (EBs) in the era of {\it Gaia\/} and {\it TESS}. Including stars that host transiting substellar companions, such single-lined EBs already number in the hundreds from ground-based transit surveys and will comprise a major component of the science yield from the upcoming {\it TESS\/} mission. We explore the requirements for obtaining a given fractional precision on the masses and radii of single-lined EBs using primarily empirical means: radial velocity and eclipse measurements along with either: estimates of the primary's (1) surface gravity from high-resolution spectroscopy; (2) radius inferred from parallax, effective temperature, and bolometric flux; or (3) surface gravity and density from asteroseismology. We then compare these requirements to the precision obtained from invoking stellar models or empirical relations. We show that, for a fiducial transiting hot Jupiter system, precise, accurate, and essentially model-independent mass and radius measurements for such single-lined EBs will be possible in the era of \emph{Gaia}. These will be comparable in precision to those obtained with double-lined EBs. Moreover, the systems for which these methods can be applied will vastly outnumber double-lined EBs, thereby possessing the potential to sample a more complete range of stellar types (such as M dwarfs); these systems will also, in many cases, be more amenable to precision etallicity and abundance determinations than are double-lined EBs.
Comments: 27 pages; 11 figures; accepted by ApJ
Subjects: Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR); Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP)
Cite as: arXiv:1712.05046 [astro-ph.SR]
  (or arXiv:1712.05046v2 [astro-ph.SR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.05046
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaccf5
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Daniel Stevens [view email]
[v1] Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:25:53 UTC (849 KB)
[v2] Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:55:03 UTC (533 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Measuring Model-independent Masses and Radii of Single-Lined Eclipsing Binaries: Analytic Precision Estimates, by Daniel J. Stevens and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.SR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-12
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.EP

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack