Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1712.03120

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:1712.03120 (stat)
[Submitted on 8 Dec 2017 (v1), last revised 6 Jul 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Learning Disease vs Participant Signatures: a permutation test approach to detect identity confounding in machine learning diagnostic applications

Authors:Elias Chaibub Neto, Abhishek Pratap, Thanneer M Perumal, Meghasyam Tummalacherla, Brian M Bot, Andrew D Trister, Stephen H Friend, Lara Mangravite, Larsson Omberg
View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Disease vs Participant Signatures: a permutation test approach to detect identity confounding in machine learning diagnostic applications, by Elias Chaibub Neto and 8 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Recently, Saeb et al (2017) showed that, in diagnostic machine learning applications, having data of each subject randomly assigned to both training and test sets (record-wise data split) can lead to massive underestimation of the cross-validation prediction error, due to the presence of "subject identity confounding" caused by the classifier's ability to identify subjects, instead of recognizing disease. To solve this problem, the authors recommended the random assignment of the data of each subject to either the training or the test set (subject-wise data split). The adoption of subject-wise split has been criticized in Little et al (2017), on the basis that it can violate assumptions required by cross-validation to consistently estimate generalization error. In particular, adopting subject-wise splitting in heterogeneous data-sets might lead to model under-fitting and larger classification errors. Hence, Little et al argue that perhaps the overestimation of prediction errors with subject-wise cross-validation, rather than underestimation with record-wise cross-validation, is the reason for the discrepancies between prediction error estimates generated by the two splitting strategies. In order to shed light on this controversy, we focus on simpler classification performance metrics and develop permutation tests that can detect identity confounding. By focusing on permutation tests, we are able to evaluate the merits of record-wise and subject-wise data splits under more general statistical dependencies and distributional structures of the data, including situations where cross-validation breaks down. We illustrate the application of our tests using synthetic and real data from a Parkinson's disease study.
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP)
Cite as: arXiv:1712.03120 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:1712.03120v2 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.03120
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Elias Chaibub Neto [view email]
[v1] Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:23:58 UTC (1,137 KB)
[v2] Fri, 6 Jul 2018 23:32:58 UTC (1,137 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Disease vs Participant Signatures: a permutation test approach to detect identity confounding in machine learning diagnostic applications, by Elias Chaibub Neto and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-12
Change to browse by:
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack