Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > econ > arXiv:1710.08901

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Economics > Econometrics

arXiv:1710.08901 (econ)
[Submitted on 24 Oct 2017]

Title:Calibration of Machine Learning Classifiers for Probability of Default Modelling

Authors:Pedro G. Fonseca, Hugo D. Lopes
View a PDF of the paper titled Calibration of Machine Learning Classifiers for Probability of Default Modelling, by Pedro G. Fonseca and Hugo D. Lopes
View PDF
Abstract:Binary classification is highly used in credit scoring in the estimation of probability of default. The validation of such predictive models is based both on rank ability, and also on calibration (i.e. how accurately the probabilities output by the model map to the observed probabilities). In this study we cover the current best practices regarding calibration for binary classification, and explore how different approaches yield different results on real world credit scoring data. The limitations of evaluating credit scoring models using only rank ability metrics are explored. A benchmark is run on 18 real world datasets, and results compared. The calibration techniques used are Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression. Also, different machine learning models are used: Logistic Regression, Random Forest Classifiers, and Gradient Boosting Classifiers. Results show that when the dataset is treated as a time series, the use of re-calibration with Isotonic Regression is able to improve the long term calibration better than the alternative methods. Using re-calibration, the non-parametric models are able to outperform the Logistic Regression on Brier Score Loss.
Comments: Keywords: Binary classification, Probability of Default, Calibration, Credit Risk, Isotonic Regression, Platt Scaling
Subjects: Econometrics (econ.EM); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1710.08901 [econ.EM]
  (or arXiv:1710.08901v1 [econ.EM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.08901
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Pedro Gabriel Fonseca [view email]
[v1] Tue, 24 Oct 2017 17:36:51 UTC (957 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Calibration of Machine Learning Classifiers for Probability of Default Modelling, by Pedro G. Fonseca and Hugo D. Lopes
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
econ.EM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-10
Change to browse by:
econ
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack