Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1709.08115

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Performance

arXiv:1709.08115 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Sep 2017]

Title:GB-PANDAS: Throughput and heavy-traffic optimality analysis for affinity scheduling

Authors:Ali Yekkehkhany, Avesta Hojjati, Mohammad H Hajiesmaili
View a PDF of the paper titled GB-PANDAS: Throughput and heavy-traffic optimality analysis for affinity scheduling, by Ali Yekkehkhany and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Dynamic affinity scheduling has been an open problem for nearly three decades. The problem is to dynamically schedule multi-type tasks to multi-skilled servers such that the resulting queueing system is both stable in the capacity region (throughput optimality) and the mean delay of tasks is minimized at high loads near the boundary of the capacity region (heavy-traffic optimality). As for applications, data-intensive analytics like MapReduce, Hadoop, and Dryad fit into this setting, where the set of servers is heterogeneous for different task types, so the pair of task type and server determines the processing rate of the task. The load balancing algorithm used in such frameworks is an example of affinity scheduling which is desired to be both robust and delay optimal at high loads when hot-spots occur. Fluid model planning, the MaxWeight algorithm, and the generalized $c\mu$-rule are among the first algorithms proposed for affinity scheduling that have theoretical guarantees on being optimal in different senses, which will be discussed in the related work section. All these algorithms are not practical for use in data center applications because of their non-realistic assumptions. The join-the-shortest-queue-MaxWeight (JSQ-MaxWeight), JSQ-Priority, and weighted-workload algorithms are examples of load balancing policies for systems with two and three levels of data locality with a rack structure. In this work, we propose the Generalized-Balanced-Pandas algorithm (GB-PANDAS) for a system with multiple levels of data locality and prove its throughput optimality. We prove this result under an arbitrary distribution for service times, whereas most previous theoretical work assumes geometric distribution for service times. The extensive simulation results show that the GB-PANDAS algorithm alleviates the mean delay and has a better performance than the JSQ-MaxWeight algorithm by twofold
Comments: IFIP WG 7.3 Performance 2017 - The 35th International Symposium on Computer Performance, Modeling, Measurements and Evaluation 2017
Subjects: Performance (cs.PF)
Cite as: arXiv:1709.08115 [cs.PF]
  (or arXiv:1709.08115v1 [cs.PF] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.08115
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3199524.3199528
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Ali Yekkehkhany [view email]
[v1] Sat, 23 Sep 2017 20:38:25 UTC (678 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled GB-PANDAS: Throughput and heavy-traffic optimality analysis for affinity scheduling, by Ali Yekkehkhany and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.PF
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Ali Yekkehkhany
Avesta Hojjati
Mohammad Hassan Hajiesmaili
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack