Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1709.03162

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Machine Learning

arXiv:1709.03162 (stat)
[Submitted on 10 Sep 2017 (v1), last revised 8 Aug 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Bayesian bandits: balancing the exploration-exploitation tradeoff via double sampling

Authors:Iñigo Urteaga, Chris H. Wiggins
View a PDF of the paper titled Bayesian bandits: balancing the exploration-exploitation tradeoff via double sampling, by I\~nigo Urteaga and Chris H. Wiggins
View PDF
Abstract:Reinforcement learning studies how to balance exploration and exploitation in real-world systems, optimizing interactions with the world while simultaneously learning how the world operates. One general class of algorithms for such learning is the multi-armed bandit setting. Randomized probability matching, based upon the Thompson sampling approach introduced in the 1930s, has recently been shown to perform well and to enjoy provable optimality properties. It permits generative, interpretable modeling in a Bayesian setting, where prior knowledge is incorporated, and the computed posteriors naturally capture the full state of knowledge. In this work, we harness the information contained in the Bayesian posterior and estimate its sufficient statistics via sampling. In several application domains, for example in health and medicine, each interaction with the world can be expensive and invasive, whereas drawing samples from the model is relatively inexpensive. Exploiting this viewpoint, we develop a double sampling technique driven by the uncertainty in the learning process: it favors exploitation when certain about the properties of each arm, exploring otherwise. The proposed algorithm does not make any distributional assumption and it is applicable to complex reward distributions, as long as Bayesian posterior updates are computable. Utilizing the estimated posterior sufficient statistics, double sampling autonomously balances the exploration-exploitation tradeoff to make better informed decisions. We empirically show its reduced cumulative regret when compared to state-of-the-art alternatives in representative bandit settings.
Comments: The software used for this study is publicly available at this https URL
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation (stat.CO)
MSC classes: I.2.6
Cite as: arXiv:1709.03162 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:1709.03162v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.03162
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Iñigo Urteaga [view email]
[v1] Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:58:34 UTC (249 KB)
[v2] Wed, 8 Aug 2018 20:20:27 UTC (788 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Bayesian bandits: balancing the exploration-exploitation tradeoff via double sampling, by I\~nigo Urteaga and Chris H. Wiggins
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.ML
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
stat
stat.CO

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack