Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1708.09088

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:1708.09088 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Aug 2017 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2017 (this version, v2)]

Title:A Comparative Study of Matrix Factorization and Random Walk with Restart in Recommender Systems

Authors:Haekyu Park, Jinhong Jung, U Kang
View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparative Study of Matrix Factorization and Random Walk with Restart in Recommender Systems, by Haekyu Park and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Between matrix factorization or Random Walk with Restart (RWR), which method works better for recommender systems? Which method handles explicit or implicit feedback data better? Does additional information help recommendation? Recommender systems play an important role in many e-commerce services such as Amazon and Netflix to recommend new items to a user. Among various recommendation strategies, collaborative filtering has shown good performance by using rating patterns of users. Matrix factorization and random walk with restart are the most representative collaborative filtering methods. However, it is still unclear which method provides better recommendation performance despite their extensive utility.
In this paper, we provide a comparative study of matrix factorization and RWR in recommender systems. We exactly formulate each correspondence of the two methods according to various tasks in recommendation. Especially, we newly devise an RWR method using global bias term which corresponds to a matrix factorization method using biases. We describe details of the two methods in various aspects of recommendation quality such as how those methods handle cold-start problem which typically happens in collaborative filtering. We extensively perform experiments over real-world datasets to evaluate the performance of each method in terms of various measures. We observe that matrix factorization performs better with explicit feedback ratings while RWR is better with implicit ones. We also observe that exploiting global popularities of items is advantageous in the performance and that side information produces positive synergy with explicit feedback but gives negative effects with implicit one.
Comments: 10 pages, Appears in IEEE International Conference on Big Data 2017 (IEEE BigData 2017)
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:1708.09088 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:1708.09088v2 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.09088
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Haekyu Park [view email]
[v1] Wed, 30 Aug 2017 02:08:14 UTC (998 KB)
[v2] Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:45:51 UTC (994 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparative Study of Matrix Factorization and Random Walk with Restart in Recommender Systems, by Haekyu Park and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Haekyu Park
Jinhong Jung
U. Kang
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack