Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1708.01403

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Information Theory

arXiv:1708.01403 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2017 (v1), last revised 22 Feb 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Optimal Throughput Fairness Trade-offs for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access over Fading Channels

Authors:Hong Xing, Yuanwei Liu, Arumugam Nallanathan, Zhiguo Ding, H. Vincent Poor
View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal Throughput Fairness Trade-offs for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access over Fading Channels, by Hong Xing and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Recently, non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) has attracted considerable interest as one of the 5G-enabling techniques. However, users with better channel conditions in downlink communications intrinsically benefits from NOMA thanks to successive decoding, judicious designs are required to guarantee user fairness. In this paper, a two-user downlink NOMA system over fading channels is considered. For delay-tolerant transmission, the average sum-rate is maximized subject to both average and peak power constraints as well as a minimum average user rate constraint. The optimal resource allocation is obtained using Lagrangian dual decomposition under full channel state information at the transmitter (CSIT), while an effective power allocation policy under partial CSIT is also developed based on analytical results. In parallel, for delay-limited transmission, the sum of delay-limited throughput (DLT) is maximized subject to a maximum allowable user outage constraint under full CSIT, and the analysis for the sum of DLT is also performed under partial CSIT. Furthermore, an optimal orthogonal multiple access (OMA) scheme is also studied as a benchmark to prove the superiority of NOMA over OMA under full CSIT. Finally, the theoretical analysis is verified by simulations via different trade-offs for the average sum-rate (sum-DLT) versus the minimum (maximum) average user rate (outage) requirement.
Comments: 35 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables, the longer version of the paper with the same title
Subjects: Information Theory (cs.IT); Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI)
Cite as: arXiv:1708.01403 [cs.IT]
  (or arXiv:1708.01403v2 [cs.IT] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.01403
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hong Xing [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Aug 2017 07:27:09 UTC (1,569 KB)
[v2] Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:23:53 UTC (2,299 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Optimal Throughput Fairness Trade-offs for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access over Fading Channels, by Hong Xing and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.IT
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.NI
math
math.IT

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Hong Xing
Yuanwei Liu
Arumugam Nallanathan
Zhiguo Ding
H. Vincent Poor
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack