Title:Good versus Evil: A Framework for Optimal Investment Strategies for Competing Camps in a Social Network

Abstract:We study the problem of optimally investing in nodes of a social network in a competitive setting, wherein two camps attempt to maximize adoption of their opinions by the population. Using a natural model of opinion dynamics, we formulate the problem as a zero-sum game with the players being the two camps. We first study optimal strategies of both camps in the fundamental setting where each camp aims to drive the average opinion of the population in its favor. We consider several settings of the problem, namely, when one of the camps has uncertain information about the values of the model parameters, when a camp aims at maximizing competitor's investment required to drive the average opinion in its favor, and when the influence of a camp on a node is a concave function of its investment on that node. We also study the problem under common coupled constraints on the combined investments by the camps and derive optimal strategies of the two camps, and hence show an interesting relation between the maxmin and minmax values. For a quantitative and illustrative study, we conduct simulations on real-world datasets and provide results and insights.