Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > gr-qc > arXiv:1705.09833

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

arXiv:1705.09833 (gr-qc)
[Submitted on 27 May 2017]

Title:A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity

Authors:Jacob Lange, Richard O'Shaughnessy, Michael Boyle, Juan Calderón Bustillo, Manuela Campanelli, Tony Chu, James A. Clark, Nicholas Demos, Heather Fong, James Healy, Daniel Hemberger, Ian Hinder, Karan Jani, Bhavesh Khamesra, Lawrence E. Kidder, Prayush Kumar, Pablo Laguna, Carlos O. Lousto, Geoffrey Lovelace, Serguei Ossokine, Harald Pfeiffer, Mark A. Scheel, Deirdre Shoemaker, Bela Szilagyi, Saul Teukolsky, Yosef Zlochower
View a PDF of the paper titled A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity, by Jacob Lange and 25 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We present and assess a Bayesian method to interpret gravitational wave signals from binary black holes. Our method directly compares gravitational wave data to numerical relativity simulations. This procedure bypasses approximations used in semi-analytical models for compact binary coalescence. In this work, we use only the full posterior parameter distribution for generic nonprecessing binaries, drawing inferences away from the set of NR simulations used, via interpolation of a single scalar quantity (the marginalized log-likelihood, $\ln {\cal L}$) evaluated by comparing data to nonprecessing binary black hole simulations. We also compare the data to generic simulations, and discuss the effectiveness of this procedure for generic sources. We specifically assess the impact of higher order modes, repeating our interpretation with both $l\le2$ as well as $l\le3$ harmonic modes. Using the $l\le3$ higher modes, we gain more information from the signal and can better constrain the parameters of the gravitational wave signal. We assess and quantify several sources of systematic error that our procedure could introduce, including simulation resolution and duration; most are negligible. We show through examples that our method can recover the parameters for equal mass, zero spin; GW150914-like; and unequal mass, precessing spin sources. Our study of this new parameter estimation method demonstrates we can quantify and understand the systematic and statistical error. This method allows us to use higher order modes from numerical relativity simulations to better constrain the black hole binary parameters.
Comments: 30 pages, 22 figures; submitted to PRD
Subjects: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:1705.09833 [gr-qc]
  (or arXiv:1705.09833v1 [gr-qc] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.09833
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 96, 104041 (2017)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104041
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jacob Lange [view email]
[v1] Sat, 27 May 2017 15:48:40 UTC (8,744 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity, by Jacob Lange and 25 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
gr-qc
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-05

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack