Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1704.05610

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Medical Physics

arXiv:1704.05610 (physics)
[Submitted on 19 Apr 2017]

Title:Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy

Authors:Myung Cho, Xiaodong Wu, Hossein Dakhah, Jirong Yi, Ryan T. Flynn, Yusung Kim, Weiyu Xu
View a PDF of the paper titled Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy, by Myung Cho and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Purpose: To provide a fast computational method, based on the proximal graph solver (POGS) - a convex optimization solver using the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), for calculating an optimal treatment plan in rotating shield brachytherapy (RSBT). RSBT treatment planning has more degrees of freedom than conventional high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) due to the addition of emission direction, and this necessitates a fast optimization technique to enable clinical usage. // Methods: The multi-helix RSBT (H-RSBT) delivery technique was considered with five representative cervical cancer patients. Treatment plans were generated for all patients using the POGS method and the previously considered commercial solver IBM CPLEX. The rectum, bladder, sigmoid, high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), and HR-CTV boundary were the structures considered in our optimization problem, called the asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control. Dose calculation resolution was 1x1x3 mm^3 for all cases. The H-RSBT applicator has 6 helices, with 33.3 mm of translation along the applicator per helical rotation and 1.7 mm spacing between dwell positions, yielding 17.5 degree emission angle spacing per 5 mm along the applicator.// Results: For each patient, HR-CTV D90, HR-CTV D100, rectum D2cc, sigmoid D2cc, and bladder D2cc matched within 1% for CPLEX and POGS. Also, we obtained similar EQD2 figures between CPLEX and POGS. POGS was around 18 times faster than CPLEX. Over all patients, total optimization times were 32.1-65.4 seconds for CPLEX and 2.1-3.9 seconds for POGS. // Conclusions: POGS substantially reduced treatment plan optimization time around 18 times for RSBT with similar HR-CTV D90, OAR D2cc values, and EQD2 figure relative to CPLEX, which is significant progress toward clinical translation of RSBT. POGS is also applicable to conventional HDR-BT.
Comments: 9 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
Cite as: arXiv:1704.05610 [physics.med-ph]
  (or arXiv:1704.05610v1 [physics.med-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.05610
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12486
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Myung Cho [view email]
[v1] Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:31:39 UTC (549 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Fast dose optimization for rotating shield brachytherapy, by Myung Cho and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.med-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-04
Change to browse by:
math
math.OC
physics

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack