Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > physics > arXiv:1703.07038

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Physics > Fluid Dynamics

arXiv:1703.07038 (physics)
[Submitted on 21 Mar 2017 (v1), last revised 27 Oct 2018 (this version, v4)]

Title:Transition in a numerical model of contact line dynamics and forced dewetting

Authors:S. Afkhami, J. Buongiorno, A. Guion, S. Popinet, Y. Saade, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski
View a PDF of the paper titled Transition in a numerical model of contact line dynamics and forced dewetting, by S. Afkhami and 6 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We investigate the transition to a Landau-Levich-Derjaguin film in forced dewetting using a quadtree adaptive solution to the Navier-Stokes equations with surface tension. We use a discretization of the capillary forces near the receding contact line that yields an equilibrium for a specified contact angle $\theta_\Delta$ called the numerical contact angle. Despite the well-known contact line singularity, dynamic simulations can proceed without any explicit additional numerical procedure. We investigate angles from $15^\circ$ to $110^\circ$ and capillary numbers from $0.00085$ to $0.2$ where the mesh size $\Delta$ is varied in the range of $0.0035$ to $0.06$ of the capillary length $l_c$. To interpret the results, we use Cox's theory which involves a microscopic distance $r_m$ and a microscopic angle $\theta_e$. In the numerical case, the equivalent of $\theta_e$ is the angle $\theta_\Delta$ and we find that Cox's theory also applies. We introduce the scaling factor or gauge function $\phi$ so that $r_m = \Delta/\phi$ and estimate this gauge function by comparing our numerics to Cox's theory. The comparison provides a direct assessment of the agreement of the numerics with Cox's theory and reveals a critical feature of the numerical treatment of contact line dynamics: agreement is poor at small angles while it is better at large angles. This scaling factor is shown to depend only on $\theta_\Delta$ and the viscosity ratio $q$. In the case of small $\theta_e$, we use the prediction by Eggers [Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 93, pp 094502, 2004] of the critical capillary number for the Landau-Levich-Derjaguin forced dewetting transition. We generalize this prediction to large $\theta_e$ and arbitrary $q$ and express the critical capillary number as a function of $\theta_e$ and $r_m$. An analogy can be drawn between $r_m$ and the numerical slip length.
Comments: This version of the paper includes the corrections indicated in Ref. [1]
Subjects: Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1703.07038 [physics.flu-dyn]
  (or arXiv:1703.07038v4 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.07038
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Journal of Computational Physics, Volume 374, Pages 1061-1093, 2018
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.06.078
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Shahriar Afkhami [view email]
[v1] Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:10:55 UTC (1,048 KB)
[v2] Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:27:24 UTC (2,057 KB)
[v3] Thu, 5 Jul 2018 14:52:43 UTC (2,059 KB)
[v4] Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:19:50 UTC (2,053 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Transition in a numerical model of contact line dynamics and forced dewetting, by S. Afkhami and 6 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.flu-dyn
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-03
Change to browse by:
physics
physics.comp-ph

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack