Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1703.04332

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:1703.04332 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2017 (v1), last revised 17 Dec 2017 (this version, v4)]

Title:A Pitfall of Unsupervised Pre-Training

Authors:Michele Alberti, Mathias Seuret, Rolf Ingold, Marcus Liwicki (University Of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland)
View a PDF of the paper titled A Pitfall of Unsupervised Pre-Training, by Michele Alberti and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The point of this paper is to question typical assumptions in deep learning and suggest alternatives. A particular contribution is to prove that even if a Stacked Convolutional Auto-Encoder is good at reconstructing pictures, it is not necessarily good at discriminating their classes. When using Auto-Encoders, intuitively one assumes that features which are good for reconstruction will also lead to high classification accuracy. Indeed, it became research practice and is a suggested strategy by introductory books. However, we prove that this is not always the case. We thoroughly investigate the quality of features produced by Stacked Convolutional Auto-Encoders when trained to reconstruct their input. In particular, we analyze the relation between the reconstruction and classification capabilities of the network, if we were to use the same features for both tasks. Experimental results suggest that in fact, there is no correlation between the reconstruction score and the quality of features for a classification task. This means, more formally, that the sub-dimension representation space learned from the Stacked Convolutional Auto-Encoder (while being trained for input reconstruction) is not necessarily better separable than the initial input space. Furthermore, we show that the reconstruction error is not a good metric to assess the quality of features, because it is biased by the decoder quality. We do not question the usefulness of pre-training, but we conclude that aiming for the lowest reconstruction error is not necessarily a good idea if afterwards one performs a classification task.
Comments: Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Deep Learning: Bridging Theory and Practice, December 2017
Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
ACM classes: I.2.6, I.5.2, I.7.5
Cite as: arXiv:1703.04332 [cs.CV]
  (or arXiv:1703.04332v4 [cs.CV] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.04332
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michele Alberti [view email]
[v1] Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:19:00 UTC (1,522 KB)
[v2] Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:30:06 UTC (1,522 KB)
[v3] Wed, 31 May 2017 07:51:08 UTC (1,522 KB)
[v4] Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:22:25 UTC (5,370 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Pitfall of Unsupervised Pre-Training, by Michele Alberti and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CV
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-03
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Michele Alberti
Mathias Seuret
Rolf Ingold
Marcus Liwicki
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack