Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1702.05543

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Computational Complexity

arXiv:1702.05543 (cs)
[Submitted on 17 Feb 2017 (v1), last revised 14 Jul 2019 (this version, v4)]

Title:A Fixed-Parameter Perspective on #BIS

Authors:Radu Curticapean, Holger Dell, Fedor Fomin, Leslie Ann Goldberg, John Lapinskas
View a PDF of the paper titled A Fixed-Parameter Perspective on #BIS, by Radu Curticapean and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The problem of (approximately) counting the independent sets of a bipartite graph (#BIS) is the canonical approximate counting problem that is complete in the intermediate complexity class #RH\Pi_1. It is believed that #BIS does not have an efficient approximation algorithm but also that it is not NP-hard. We study the robustness of the intermediate complexity of #BIS by considering variants of the problem parameterised by the size of the independent set. We exhaustively map the complexity landscape for three problems, with respect to exact computation and approximation and with respect to conventional and parameterised complexity. The three problems are counting independent sets of a given size, counting independent sets with a given number of vertices in one vertex class and counting maximum independent sets amongst those with a given number of vertices in one vertex class. Among other things, we show that all of these problems are NP-hard to approximate within any polynomial ratio. (This is surprising because the corresponding problems without the size parameter are complete in #RH\Pi_1, and hence are not believed to be NP-hard.) We also show that the first problem is #W[1]-hard to solve exactly but admits an FPTRAS, whereas the other two are W[1]-hard to approximate even within any polynomial ratio. Finally, we show that, when restricted to graphs of bounded degree, all three problems have efficient exact fixed-parameter algorithms.
Comments: to appear in Algorithmica
Subjects: Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
ACM classes: F.2.2; G.2.1; G.2.2
Cite as: arXiv:1702.05543 [cs.CC]
  (or arXiv:1702.05543v4 [cs.CC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.05543
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.13
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Leslie Ann Goldberg [view email]
[v1] Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:43:14 UTC (30 KB)
[v2] Wed, 28 Jun 2017 02:33:40 UTC (27 KB)
[v3] Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:22:15 UTC (27 KB)
[v4] Sun, 14 Jul 2019 10:17:03 UTC (27 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Fixed-Parameter Perspective on #BIS, by Radu Curticapean and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-02
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Radu Curticapean
Holger Dell
Fedor V. Fomin
Leslie Ann Goldberg
John Lapinskas
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack