Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

arXiv:1701.07261 (physics)
[Submitted on 25 Jan 2017 (v1), last revised 10 May 2017 (this version, v2)]

Title:Einstein's 1917 Static Model of the Universe: A Centennial Review

Authors:Cormac O'Raifeartaigh, Michael O'Keeffe, Werner Nahm, Simon Mitton
View PDF
Abstract:We present a historical review of Einstein's 1917 paper 'Cosmological Considerations in the General Theory of Relativity' to mark the centenary of a key work that set the foundations of modern cosmology. We find that the paper followed as a natural next step after Einstein's development of the general theory of relativity and that the work offers many insights into his thoughts on relativity, astronomy and cosmology. Our review includes a description of the observational and theoretical background to the paper; a paragraph-by-paragraph guided tour of the work; a discussion of Einstein's views of issues such as the relativity of inertia, the curvature of space and the cosmological constant. Particular attention is paid to little-known aspects of the paper such as Einstein's failure to test his model against observation, his failure to consider the stability of the model and a mathematical oversight concerning his interpretation of the role of the cosmological constant. We recall the response of theorists and astronomers to Einstein's cosmology in the context of the alternate models of the universe proposed by Willem de Sitter, Alexander Friedman and Georges Lemaitre. Finally, we describe the relevance of the Einstein World in today's 'emergent' cosmologies.
Comments: Revised version of paper with some edits and corrections. Accepted for publication in the European Physical Journal (H)
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1701.07261 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:1701.07261v2 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.07261
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2017-80002-5

Submission history

From: Cormac O'Raifeartaigh [view email]
[v1] Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:53:40 UTC (1,249 KB)
[v2] Wed, 10 May 2017 14:04:44 UTC (1,039 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.hist-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.CO
physics

References & Citations

1 blog link

(what is this?)
export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)