Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1701.02924

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

arXiv:1701.02924 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 11 Jan 2017]

Title:The effect of an offset polar cap dipolar magnetic field on the modeling of the Vela pulsar's $γ$-ray light curves

Authors:Monica Barnard, Christo Venter, Alice K. Harding
View a PDF of the paper titled The effect of an offset polar cap dipolar magnetic field on the modeling of the Vela pulsar's $\gamma$-ray light curves, by Monica Barnard and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We performed geometric pulsar light curve modeling using static, retarded vacuum, and offset polar cap (PC) dipole $B$-fields (the latter is characterized by a parameter $\epsilon$), in conjunction with standard two-pole caustic (TPC) and outer gap (OG) emission geometries. The offset-PC dipole $B$-field mimics deviations from the static dipole (which corresponds to $\epsilon=0$). In addition to constant-emissivity geometric models, we also considered a slot gap (SG) $E$-field associated with the offset-PC dipole $B$-field and found that its inclusion leads to qualitatively different light curves. Solving the particle transport equation shows that the particle energy only becomes large enough to yield significant curvature radiation at large altitudes above the stellar surface, given this relatively low $E$-field. Therefore, particles do not always attain the radiation-reaction limit. Our overall optimal light curve fit is for the retarded vacuum dipole field and OG model, at an inclination angle $\alpha=78{_{-1}^{+1}}^{\circ}$ and observer angle $\zeta=69{_{-1}^{+2}}^{\circ}$. For this $B$-field, the TPC model is statistically disfavored compared to the OG model. For the static dipole field, neither model is significantly preferred. We found that smaller values of $\epsilon$ are favored for the offset-PC dipole field when assuming constant emissivity, and larger $\epsilon$ values favored for variable emissivity, but not significantly so. When multiplying the SG $E$-field by a factor of 100, we found improved light curve fits, with $\alpha$ and $\zeta$ being closer to best fits from independent studies, as well as curvature radiation reaction at lower altitudes.
Comments: 42 pages, 17 figures
Subjects: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:1701.02924 [astro-ph.HE]
  (or arXiv:1701.02924v1 [astro-ph.HE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1701.02924
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 832, Issue 2, article id. 107, 23 pp. (2016)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/107
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Monica Barnard Mrs [view email]
[v1] Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:10:59 UTC (2,093 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The effect of an offset polar cap dipolar magnetic field on the modeling of the Vela pulsar's $\gamma$-ray light curves, by Monica Barnard and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.HE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2017-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack