Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1612.04345

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:1612.04345 (stat)
[Submitted on 13 Dec 2016 (v1), last revised 14 Dec 2016 (this version, v2)]

Title:Corrections for multiple comparisons in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping

Authors:Daniel Mirman, Jon-Frederick Landrigan, Spiro Kokolis, Sean Verillo, Casey Ferrara, Dorian Pustina
View a PDF of the paper titled Corrections for multiple comparisons in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping, by Daniel Mirman and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) is an important method for basic and translational human neuroscience research. VLSM leverages modern neuroimaging analysis techniques to build on the classic approach of examining the relationship between location of brain damage and cognitive deficits. Testing an association between deficit severity and lesion status in each voxel involves very many individual tests and requires statistical correction for multiple comparisons. Several strategies have been adapted from analysis of functional neuroimaging data, though VLSM faces a more difficult trade-off between avoiding false positives and statistical power (missing true effects). Non-parametric, permutation-based methods are generally preferable because they do not make assumptions that are likely to be violated by skewed distributions of behavioral deficit (symptom) scores and by the necessary spatial contiguity of stroke lesions. We used simulated and real deficit scores from a sample of approximately 100 individuals with left hemisphere stroke to evaluate two such permutation-based approaches. Using permutation to set a minimum cluster size identified a region that systematically extended well beyond the true region, even under the most conservative settings tested here, making it ill-suited to identifying brain-behavior relationships. In contrast, generalizing the standard permutation-based family-wise error correction approach provided a principled way to balance false positives and false negatives. An implementation of this continuous permutation-based FWER correction method is available at this https URL
Comments: 20 pages, 11 figures
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1612.04345 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:1612.04345v2 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1612.04345
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Daniel Mirman [view email]
[v1] Tue, 13 Dec 2016 20:29:00 UTC (1,828 KB)
[v2] Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:52:37 UTC (1,828 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Corrections for multiple comparisons in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping, by Daniel Mirman and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-12
Change to browse by:
q-bio
q-bio.NC
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack