Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cond-mat > arXiv:1611.04402

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Condensed Matter > Materials Science

arXiv:1611.04402 (cond-mat)
[Submitted on 14 Nov 2016 (v1), last revised 5 Jun 2018 (this version, v2)]

Title:Impact of strain and morphology on magnetic properties of Fe$_3$O$_4$/NiO bilayers grown on Nb:SrTiO$_3$(001) and MgO(001)

Authors:Olga Kuschel, Nico Pathé, Tobias Schemme, Kevin Ruwisch, Jari Rodewald, Ralph Buß, Florian Bertram, Timo Kuschel, Karsten Kuepper, Joachim Wollschläger
View a PDF of the paper titled Impact of strain and morphology on magnetic properties of Fe$_3$O$_4$/NiO bilayers grown on Nb:SrTiO$_3$(001) and MgO(001), by Olga Kuschel and 9 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We present a comparative study on the morphology and structural as well as magnetic properties of crystalline Fe$_3$O$_4$/NiO bilayers grown on both MgO(001) and SrTiO$_3$(001) substrates by reactive molecular beam epitaxy. These structures are investigated by means of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, low energy electron diffraction, x-ray reflectivity and diffraction as well as vibrating sample magnetometry. While the lattice mismatch of NiO grown on MgO(001) is only 0.8%, it is exposed to a lateral lattice mismatch of -6.9% if grown on SrTiO$_3$. In the case of Fe$_3$O$_4$, the misfit strain on MgO(001) and SrTiO$_3$(001) amounts to 0.3% and -7.5%, respectively. To clarify the relaxation process of the bilayer system, the film thicknesses of the magnetite and nickel oxide films have been varied between 5 and 20nm. While NiO films are well ordered on both substrates, Fe$_3$O$_4$ films grown on NiO/SrTiO$_3$ exhibit a higher surface roughness as well as lower structural ordering compared to films grown on NiO/MgO. Further, NiO films grow pseudomorphic in the investigated thickness range on MgO substrates without any indication of relaxation, whereas on SrTiO$_3$ the NiO films show strong strain relaxation. Fe$_3$O$_4$ films exhibit also strong relaxation even for films of 5nm thickness on both NiO/MgO as well as on NiO/SrTiO$_3$. The magnetite layers on both substrates show a fourfold magnetic in-plane anisotropy with magnetic easy axes pointing in $\left\langle100\right\rangle$ directions. The coercive field is strongly enhanced for magnetite grown on NiO/SrTiO$_3$ due to higher density of structural defects, compared to magnetite grown on NiO/MgO.
Comments: 11 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
Cite as: arXiv:1611.04402 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
  (or arXiv:1611.04402v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.04402
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Materials 11, 1122 (2018)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11071122
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Olga Kuschel [view email]
[v1] Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:56:13 UTC (565 KB)
[v2] Tue, 5 Jun 2018 11:55:04 UTC (597 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Impact of strain and morphology on magnetic properties of Fe$_3$O$_4$/NiO bilayers grown on Nb:SrTiO$_3$(001) and MgO(001), by Olga Kuschel and 9 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cond-mat.mtrl-sci
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-11
Change to browse by:
cond-mat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack