Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1610.09335

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

arXiv:1610.09335 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 28 Oct 2016 (v1), last revised 12 Sep 2017 (this version, v3)]

Title:Another baryon miracle? Testing solutions to the "missing dwarfs" problem

Authors:Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez, Aurel Schneider, Emmanouil Papastergis, Darren S. Reed, George Lake
View a PDF of the paper titled Another baryon miracle? Testing solutions to the "missing dwarfs" problem, by Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The dearth of dwarf galaxies in the local universe is hard to reconcile with the large number of low mass haloes expected within the concordance $\Lambda$CDM paradigm. In this paper we perform a systematic evaluation of the uncertainties affecting the measurement of DM halo abundance using galaxy kinematics. Using a large sample of dwarf galaxies with spatially resolved kinematic data we derive a correction to obtain the observed abundance of galaxies as a function of their halo maximum circular velocity from the line-of-sight velocity function in the Local Volume. This estimate provides a direct means of comparing the predictions of theoretical models and simulations (including nonstandard cosmologies and novel galaxy formation physics) to the observational constraints. The new "galactic $V_{max}$" function is steeper than the line-of-sight velocity function but still shallower than the theoretical CDM expectation, showing that some unaccounted physical process is necessary to reduce the abundance of galaxies and/or drastically modify their density profiles compared to CDM haloes. Using this new galactic $V_{max}$ function, we investigate the viability of baryonic solutions such as feedback-powered outflows and photoevaporation of gas from an ionising radiation background. At the 3-$\sigma$ confidence level neither energetic feedback nor photoevaporation are effective enough to reconcile the disagreement. In the case of maximum baryonic effects, the theoretical estimate still deviates significantly from the observations for $V_{max} < 60$ km/s. CDM predicts at least 1.8 times more galaxies with $V_{max} = 50$ km/s and 2.5 times more than observed at $30$ km/s. Recent hydrodynamic simulations seem to resolve the discrepancy but disagree with the properties of observed galaxies with resolved kinematics. (abridged)
Comments: 17 pages, 22 figures; major revisions include clarification of the method, expanded comparison with simulations with a new figure, analysis of uncertainties in model as well as pressure support corrections, and a new table with nomenclature
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as: arXiv:1610.09335 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:1610.09335v3 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.09335
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty146
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:18:09 UTC (858 KB)
[v2] Tue, 17 Jan 2017 19:10:34 UTC (699 KB)
[v3] Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:48:34 UTC (758 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Another baryon miracle? Testing solutions to the "missing dwarfs" problem, by Sebastian Trujillo-Gomez and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.CO
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-10
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.GA

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack