Computer Science > Digital Libraries
[Submitted on 8 Oct 2016 (this version), latest version 26 Jun 2017 (v2)]
Title:First version of a categorization of arguments for counting methods for publication and citation indicators
View PDFAbstract:Due to the increasing number of authors per publication, a change in counting method for a publication or citation indicator will often change the result of the indicator. Therefore it is important to know why a specific counting method has been applied. I have analyzed arguments for counting methods in a sample of 13 recent bibliometric studies and compared the result with discussions of arguments for counting methods in three older studies. Based on the arguments in the studies I formed argument categories which were grouped based on the underlying logics of the arguments. It resulted in four groups which can be used to describe and discuss how bibliometric studies with publication and citation indicators argue for counting methods. The first group focuses on arguments related to what an indicator measures, the next group on avoiding double counting of publications and/or citations, the third on pragmatic reasons for the choice of counting method, and the fourth group on an indicators influence on the research community or how it is influenced by the research community.
Submission history
From: Marianne Gauffriau [view email][v1] Sat, 8 Oct 2016 15:39:31 UTC (602 KB)
[v2] Mon, 26 Jun 2017 20:48:14 UTC (665 KB)
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.