Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > q-bio > arXiv:1609.00680

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Quantitative Biology > Biomolecules

arXiv:1609.00680 (q-bio)
[Submitted on 2 Sep 2016 (v1), last revised 27 Nov 2016 (this version, v6)]

Title:Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model

Authors:Sheng Wang, Siqi Sun, Zhen Li, Renyu Zhang, Jinbo Xu
View a PDF of the paper titled Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model, by Sheng Wang and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Recently exciting progress has been made on protein contact prediction, but the predicted contacts for proteins without many sequence homologs is still of low quality and not very useful for de novo structure prediction. This paper presents a new deep learning method that predicts contacts by integrating both evolutionary coupling (EC) and sequence conservation information through an ultra-deep neural network formed by two deep residual networks. This deep neural network allows us to model very complex sequence-contact relationship as well as long-range inter-contact correlation. Our method greatly outperforms existing contact prediction methods and leads to much more accurate contact-assisted protein folding. Tested on three datasets of 579 proteins, the average top L long-range prediction accuracy obtained our method, the representative EC method CCMpred and the CASP11 winner MetaPSICOV is 0.47, 0.21 and 0.30, respectively; the average top L/10 long-range accuracy of our method, CCMpred and MetaPSICOV is 0.77, 0.47 and 0.59, respectively. Ab initio folding using our predicted contacts as restraints can yield correct folds (i.e., TMscore>0.6) for 203 test proteins, while that using MetaPSICOV- and CCMpred-predicted contacts can do so for only 79 and 62 proteins, respectively. Further, our contact-assisted models have much better quality than template-based models. Using our predicted contacts as restraints, we can (ab initio) fold 208 of the 398 membrane proteins with TMscore>0.5. By contrast, when the training proteins of our method are used as templates, homology modeling can only do so for 10 of them. One interesting finding is that even if we do not train our prediction models with any membrane proteins, our method works very well on membrane protein prediction. Finally, in recent blind CAMEO benchmark our method successfully folded 5 test proteins with a novel fold.
Subjects: Biomolecules (q-bio.BM); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:1609.00680 [q-bio.BM]
  (or arXiv:1609.00680v6 [q-bio.BM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.00680
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: PLoS Comput Biol 13(1): e1005324, 2017
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005324
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Jinbo Xu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:41:54 UTC (973 KB)
[v2] Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:39:23 UTC (1,063 KB)
[v3] Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:09:45 UTC (1,089 KB)
[v4] Fri, 16 Sep 2016 23:08:52 UTC (1,372 KB)
[v5] Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:01:32 UTC (2,107 KB)
[v6] Sun, 27 Nov 2016 22:32:50 UTC (2,350 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model, by Sheng Wang and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
q-bio.BM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-09
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
q-bio
q-bio.QM
stat
stat.ML

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

1 blog link

(what is this?)
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack