Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Physics Education

arXiv:1609.00018 (physics)
[Submitted on 20 Feb 2016]

Title:Can Free-Response Questions Be Approximated by Multiple-Choice Equivalents?

Authors:Shih-Yin Lin, Chandralekha Singh
View PDF
Abstract:We discuss a study to evaluate the extent to which free-response questions can be approximated by multiple-choice equivalents. Two carefully designed research-based multiple-choice questions were transformed into a free-response format and administered on the final exam in a calculus-based introductory physics course. The original multiple-choice questions were administered in another, similar introductory physics course on the final exam. Our findings suggest that carefully designed multiple-choice questions can reflect the relative performance on the free-response questions while maintaining the benefits of ease of grading and quantitative analysis, especially if the different choices in the multiple-choice questions are weighted to reflect the different levels of understanding that students display.
Comments: journal version of arXiv:1603.07910
Subjects: Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:1609.00018 [physics.ed-ph]
  (or arXiv:1609.00018v1 [physics.ed-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.00018
Journal reference: Am. J. Phys. 81, 624 (2013)
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4804194

Submission history

From: Shih-Yin Lin [view email]
[v1] Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:46:48 UTC (432 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
physics.ed-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-09
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)