Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > math > arXiv:1608.07533

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Mathematics > Optimization and Control

arXiv:1608.07533 (math)
[Submitted on 26 Aug 2016 (v1), last revised 26 Sep 2016 (this version, v3)]

Title:Near-Optimal Sensor Scheduling for Batch State Estimation: Complexity, Algorithms, and Limits

Authors:Vasileios Tzoumas, Ali Jadbabaie, George J. Pappas
View a PDF of the paper titled Near-Optimal Sensor Scheduling for Batch State Estimation: Complexity, Algorithms, and Limits, by Vasileios Tzoumas and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In this paper, we focus on batch state estimation for linear systems. This problem is important in applications such as environmental field estimation, robotic navigation, and target tracking. Its difficulty lies on that limited operational resources among the sensors, e.g., shared communication bandwidth or battery power, constrain the number of sensors that can be active at each measurement step. As a result, sensor scheduling algorithms must be employed. Notwithstanding, current sensor scheduling algorithms for batch state estimation scale poorly with the system size and the time horizon. In addition, current sensor scheduling algorithms for Kalman filtering, although they scale better, provide no performance guarantees or approximation bounds for the minimization of the batch state estimation error. In this paper, one of our main contributions is to provide an algorithm that enjoys both the estimation accuracy of the batch state scheduling algorithms and the low time complexity of the Kalman filtering scheduling algorithms. In particular: 1) our algorithm is near-optimal: it achieves a solution up to a multiplicative factor 1/2 from the optimal solution, and this factor is close to the best approximation factor 1/e one can achieve in polynomial time for this problem; 2) our algorithm has (polynomial) time complexity that is not only lower than that of the current algorithms for batch state estimation; it is also lower than, or similar to, that of the current algorithms for Kalman filtering. We achieve these results by proving two properties for our batch state estimation error metric, which quantifies the square error of the minimum variance linear estimator of the batch state vector: a) it is supermodular in the choice of the sensors; b) it has a sparsity pattern (it involves matrices that are block tri-diagonal) that facilitates its evaluation at each sensor set.
Comments: Correction of typos in proofs
Subjects: Optimization and Control (math.OC); Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY); Dynamical Systems (math.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:1608.07533 [math.OC]
  (or arXiv:1608.07533v3 [math.OC] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.07533
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Vasileios Tzoumas [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:38:15 UTC (300 KB)
[v2] Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:03:17 UTC (300 KB)
[v3] Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:12:45 UTC (300 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Near-Optimal Sensor Scheduling for Batch State Estimation: Complexity, Algorithms, and Limits, by Vasileios Tzoumas and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
math.OC
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-08
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.RO
cs.SY
math
math.DS

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack