Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:1608.03984

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Performance

arXiv:1608.03984 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Aug 2016 (v1), last revised 18 Apr 2017 (this version, v3)]

Title:Performance prediction of finite-difference solvers for different computer architectures

Authors:Mathias Louboutin, Michael Lange, Felix Herrmann, Navjot Kukreja, Gerard Gorman
View a PDF of the paper titled Performance prediction of finite-difference solvers for different computer architectures, by Mathias Louboutin and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The life-cycle of a partial differential equation (PDE) solver is often characterized by three development phases: the development of a stable numerical discretization, development of a correct (verified) implementation, and the optimization of the implementation for different computer architectures. Often it is only after significant time and effort has been invested that the performance bottlenecks of a PDE solver are fully understood, and the precise details varies between different computer architectures. One way to mitigate this issue is to establish a reliable performance model that allows a numerical analyst to make reliable predictions of how well a numerical method would perform on a given computer architecture, before embarking upon potentially long and expensive implementation and optimization phases. The availability of a reliable performance model also saves developer effort as it both informs the developer on what kind of optimisations are beneficial, and when the maximum expected performance has been reached and optimisation work should stop. We show how discretization of a wave equation can be theoretically studied to understand the performance limitations of the method on modern computer architectures. We focus on the roofline model, now broadly used in the high-performance computing community, which considers the achievable performance in terms of the peak memory bandwidth and peak floating point performance of a computer with respect to algorithmic choices. A first principles analysis of operational intensity for key time-stepping finite-difference algorithms is presented. With this information available at the time of algorithm design, the expected performance on target computer systems can be used as a driver for algorithm design.
Subjects: Performance (cs.PF)
Cite as: arXiv:1608.03984 [cs.PF]
  (or arXiv:1608.03984v3 [cs.PF] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.03984
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Journal reference: Computer & Geoscience (2017) 148-157; Volume 105
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.04.014
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Mathias Louboutin [view email]
[v1] Sat, 13 Aug 2016 13:57:14 UTC (745 KB)
[v2] Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:26:22 UTC (1,088 KB)
[v3] Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:35:12 UTC (1,073 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Performance prediction of finite-difference solvers for different computer architectures, by Mathias Louboutin and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.PF
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-08
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Mathias Louboutin
Michael Lange
Felix J. Herrmann
Felix Herrmann
Navjot Kukreja
…
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack