Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > stat > arXiv:1606.06284

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Statistics > Applications

arXiv:1606.06284 (stat)
[Submitted on 19 Jun 2016]

Title:Effects of Scan Length and Shrinkage on Reliability of Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Human Connectome Project

Authors:Amanda F. Mejia, Mary Beth Nebel, Anita D. Barber, Ann S. Choe, Martin A. Lindquist
View a PDF of the paper titled Effects of Scan Length and Shrinkage on Reliability of Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Human Connectome Project, by Amanda F. Mejia and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:In this paper, we use data from the Human Connectome Project (N=461) to investigate the effect of scan length on reliability of resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) estimates produced from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI). Additionally, we study the benefits of empirical Bayes shrinkage, in which subject-level estimates borrow strength from the population average by trading a small increase in bias for a greater reduction in variance. For each subject, we compute raw and shrinkage estimates of rsFC between 300 regions identified through independent components analysis (ICA) based on rsfMRI scans varying from 3 to 30 minutes in length. The time course for each region is determined using dual regression, and rsFC is estimated as the Pearson correlation between each pair of time courses. Shrinkage estimates for each subject are computed as a weighted average between the raw subject-level estimate and the population average estimate, where the weight is determined for each connection by the relationship of within-subject variance to between-subject variance. We find that shrinkage estimates exhibit greater reliability than raw estimates for most connections, with 30-40% improvement using scans less than 10 minutes in length and 10-20% improvement using scans of 20-30 minutes. We also observe significant spatial variability in reliability of both raw and shrinkage estimates, with connections within the default mode and motor networks exhibiting the greatest reliability and between-network connections exhibiting the poorest reliability. We conclude that the scan length required for reliable estimation of rsFC depends on the specific connections of interest, and shrinkage can be used to increase reliability of rsFC, even when produced from long, high-quality rsfMRI scans.
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1606.06284 [stat.AP]
  (or arXiv:1606.06284v1 [stat.AP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.06284
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Amanda Mejia [view email]
[v1] Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:34:11 UTC (6,936 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Effects of Scan Length and Shrinkage on Reliability of Resting-State Functional Connectivity in the Human Connectome Project, by Amanda F. Mejia and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
stat.AP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2016-06
Change to browse by:
q-bio
q-bio.NC
stat

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack